This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.56.246.48 (talk) at 17:21, 26 September 2013 (→Question: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:21, 26 September 2013 by 71.56.246.48 (talk) (→Question: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comcast article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Comcast. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Comcast at the Reference desk. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comcast article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Corporate Jet in Controversy Section?
Why is it here? Comcast didn't take any bailouts from the government and has no financial issues why is this relevant for a controversy section? I just don't see it as all that controversial. 68.41.154.157 (talk) 08:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. Unless there's bailout money, government subsidies, or crimes being committed with the jet, then I'm failing to see the controversy. A company has a right to use a jet that they own for their own purposes. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
texas is missing for coverage
im not good at editing wiki's, but here's the source: http://www.comcast.com/Corporate/shop/Products/local/texas.cspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.93.73.100 (talk) 12:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Comcast Business Class
Do you think Comcast Business Class should have its own Misplaced Pages entry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.226.222 (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Xfinity
Considering how Verizon FiOS is separate from Verizon Communications, and the same with AT&T U-verse and AT&T Inc., I don't think it's far fetched to separate the triple play service Xfinity, from the telecommunications and media parent company Comcast. NThomas (talk) 04:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- I take your point, but between the two examples that you gave and the Comcast–Xfinity relationship, there’s at least one significant difference which I believe justifies not splitting the article. That is that Verizon FiOS and AT&T U-verse are brands used specifically for services delivered by way of the respective companies’ fiber-optic networks. At the risk of being snide, Xfinity is just a different name for services that are similar to those that were branded Comcast, delivered through essentially the same network.
- Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 10:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Question
If Comcast is the largest cable company in the world, why does it have such limited television in their costly basic to mid level package, which is made up of predominately crime programs, repeated programs, outdated programs, non profit religious programs, reality shows which are actually quite boring. It is a legal voyeurism of watching someones life inside their home. Which in essence, is illegal. Moreover, it is staged reality. To combine it with the crime shows filled with overt violence compared to the reality shows which are inundated with fighting, quarreling, backstabbing, competitiveness, and living an ostentatious indulgent life only to read later on about the bankruptcy, divorces and fraud in the tabloids at the grocery store. For the exception of "BUBU", which is about a light hearted loving relatively obese family that doesn't eat healthy at all, but are staged and act and look bored as heck. Food channels which I have yet to see any of this bountiful generous, tasty food in any restaurant I have eaten at. Were are these restaurants? We get all of this for $99.00 the first year and it increases each year for the basic package up to $169.00 each month. Compared to Direct TV, which is primarily home shopping networks,crime programs, food channels, religious networks, sports channels for $179.00 package for month, which is why we changed in the first place. I find it amazing that these billion dollar industries can't afford to provide any educational channels included in their basic packages which also charge at least $20.00 in city,county,state and federal taxes per month. Aren't taxes supposed to go back to the well being of the public. Isn't that we have government at all and allow it to exist? §§§§§§§§§§
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Pennsylvania articles
- High-importance Pennsylvania articles
- B-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Philadelphia articles
- High-importance Philadelphia articles
- B-Class Telecommunications articles
- High-importance Telecommunications articles