This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pinkbeast (talk | contribs) at 18:47, 3 October 2013 (→Flag cruft). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:47, 3 October 2013 by Pinkbeast (talk | contribs) (→Flag cruft)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Speedy deletion declined: Muhammad Ismail al-Muqaddam
Hello Anarchistdy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muhammad Ismail al-Muqaddam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 03:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to English cuisine may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
| List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨) |
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edinburgh
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edinburgh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- The silly bot doesn't link to talk:Edinburgh/GA1...have started some comments there. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, I've only had the chance to clean up small sections of the article so far. I'll try and do an entire article clean up when I get time. Anarchistdy (talk) 05:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Hello, I'm Besieged. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Fallout 4, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. besieged 19:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Flag cruft
So, what's _your_ rationale for ignoring the MOS? Pinkbeast (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've just seen your edit summary: "I don't understand why you removed the flags". Since I have clearly explained on the article's talk page why they are inappropriate per MOS, I don't see why you don't understand that. Pinkbeast (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I read your entire argument on the talk page, it seemed like you are just interested in causing problems rather than making it 'appropriate per MOS.' If you look at any other city, you'll see that they WILL have the flags. They help with the layout and make reading more interesting for the user.
Anarchistdy (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to fix other cities, and the MOS does not say flags should be added because they make it "interesting for the user", or as layout shims. It says they should be removed when they add no information, as is the case here. Pinkbeast (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)