This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Missvain (talk | contribs) at 00:34, 19 December 2013 (delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:34, 19 December 2013 by Missvain (talk | contribs) (delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Clarkcast
- Clarkcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of Notability for local weekend radio show. Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 09:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 09:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 09:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, no redirect Reads like this is brokered programming where the host paid to get on the radio, and the podcast following isn't that much. Generally unless a brokered show does more than actual programming, it's usually not notable. Nate • (chatter) 02:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Yup, I agree with User:Mrschimpf, no redirect, he's pay to play. I saw some mere mentions about some people who have been on his show, but, no major coverage specifically about the show. SarahStierch (talk) 00:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)