Misplaced Pages

User talk:Herbxue

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Herbxue (talk | contribs) at 17:03, 3 May 2014 (→Traditional Chinese medicine). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:03, 3 May 2014 by Herbxue (talk | contribs) (→Traditional Chinese medicine)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

TestingHerbxue (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Sandbox for Acu Mechanisms Section

Moved to User:Herbxue/Acupuncture mechanisms

new sandbox

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Herbxue/SandboxLiuBin#New_Article:_Liu_Bin


Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Herbxue. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Misplaced Pages:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jps (talk) 03:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Its about time

Hi Herbxue,

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar


This is in recognition of your persistence and courage last summer at the acupuncture article, in dealing with the attempts to say that there was a scientific consensus that acupuncture is no more effective than placebo, when the sources cited did not say that. It got pretty hot for you at one point, being dragged to ANI, and I was happy to see that the tables were turned on those who caused you that trouble. Well done! (Sorry it took so long to get to this--had a really busy fall in RL.) EMP (talk) 00:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks EMP! Very kind of you, and greatly appreciated.Herbxue (talk) 05:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Traditional Chinese medicine". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  04:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Acupuncture

Stop icon
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You're at least at 2RR now. QuackGuru (talk) 16:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Buzz off, you revert almost everything I do without discussion. You should know better than to sneak controversial material in while its being discussed on a noticeboard. Herbxue (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Traditional Chinese medicine

Information icon Hello, I'm Jh1234l. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Traditional Chinese medicine without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please explain why you removed the poaching paragraph in your edit summary.Jh1234l (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Acupuncture, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.Jh1234l (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

There is an edit summary for every edit and extensive discussion at TCM talk page. Herbxue (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)