Misplaced Pages

User talk:Floquenbeam

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 01:34, 20 May 2014 (Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Floquenbeam/Archive 6) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:34, 20 May 2014 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Floquenbeam/Archive 6) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Available, sort of, but I'm declaring bankruptcy regarding any email or previous talk page threads prior to today. If you'd like me to get involved again in something I was involved with previously, please (1) consider whether a lazy grump's participation would actually be a good idea, (b) let me know here, and (iii) note that I reserve the right to say "no thanks". --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Notes
  • Normal humans: I'm not online as much as many other admins. You probably should bug another admin if you need something in a hurry.
  • Admins: I usually check in at least a few times a day, but if something is time sensitive, go ahead and undo or change any admin action I've taken without feeling like you have to talk to me first.
  • WP:SOLVED
  • WP:LIGHTBULB
  • WP:VOGONS
  • WP:BEDFELLOWS

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Truly involved

Maybe a typo? :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

How embarrassing. Fixed. Thanks, FP@S. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Remember not, Lord, our offences

Remember not, Lord, our offences - Why am I not surprised? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Because you're observant enough to know what kind of person Scott is? --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
I wasn't. Didn't happen often that I wasn't, look for the asterisk in the third column (the others are my - rather harmless - counting mistakes), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
ps: I looked myself again, and found eight where I missed. I was learning: 1 in 2014, all the others in 2012. Only one of them is not at least an admin (3), if not bureaucrat (1) or arb (3), what does it tell us? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
ps II: the one applied for being an admin, I didn't support because of the asterisk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)