Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bobrayner (talk | contribs) at 19:46, 23 June 2014 (→Removal of referenced text: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Economics Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

“Original research”?

The concern that this article contain “original research” might be completely allayed by sufficient use of inline citations. —SlamDiego_←T 20:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Theft of the article

This article was stolen by Betascript Publishing, and published under the name of authors who did not write it. . User:Jurriaan 2 january 2011 17:27 (UTC)

Removal of referenced text

Bob Rayner has again cut out large parts of important referenced text for his ideological reasons, rather than genuine scientific reasons, without proper explanation or discussion. All I can say for now is, that if people are interested to read to full article, they can consult the version of 23 April 2014 in the archive annex of this article.Jurriaan (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Here are two good reasons:

1. Avoid original research and synthesis.

2. Don't cite a source and then directly contradict it in article content that you wrote yourself. That's a Bad Thing.

There are more reasons. bobrayner (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• Unassessed Economics articles
• Unknown-importance Economics articles
• WikiProject Economics articles