Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pdfpdf (talk | contribs) at 18:39, 2 January 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:39, 2 January 2015 by Pdfpdf (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special

Autopatrolled

(add request • view requests)
Shortcuts

User:Lopifalko

I have created 31 articles, mostly BLP about photographers, containing ample demonstration of notability and verifiability in their first draft to pass scrutiny. I am conversant with policy on copyright and on making claims with regard BLP. Lopifalko (talk) 08:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
In general, I would have suggested the creation of a minimum of 50 articles. In your case, I've found the articles to be impressively referenced and judiciously maintained. If you're not in a hurry, I wouldn't mind adding this bit to your profile if you reach at least 40 articles, just to ensure there are no ruffled feathers. At the same time, if you insist, I can add this right now too (although I would prefer the 40 benchmark). Your call. Wifione 16:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your consideration Wifione, and for being so complimentary. I'll wait until I reach 40 and come back to this. -Lopifalko (talk)
 Not done. The not done is just procedural. Lopifalko, refer to this request when you request this bit again in the future. Thanks for your contributions. Wifione 14:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Erutuon

I've created 62 non-redirect articles and 146 redirects, primarily on topics relating to linguistics and botany. My record in following policy regarding notability has been good, and according to X!'s list, all but three of the articles I created remain (and the only one that actually seems to have stayed deleted is a duplicate). I'm not creating articles at as high a rate as I used to, but at least my track record should qualify me for autopatrolled. — Eru·tuon 01:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Giso6150

The quality of my 45 articles (and my hundreds of other edits and contributions) has been consistently good and continues to improve. The type of projects that I most enjoy—creating stub articles for notable topics related to São Paulo—often yields a small flood of new articles in a short period of time. Still, only my very first article (in 2012) was ever disputed… I really do have a knack for this! I believe that I’ve demonstrated that I understand the importance of using categories, templates, references, and proper formatting in the articles that I create. Autopatrolling my humble stubs would help free up time for others to devote to trickier, messier pages. giso6150 (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 Not done. Good work but almost all one-line stubs that do not demonstrate a broad knowledge of notability or MoS. Of the three or four full length articles one BLP is borderline notable. It won't take the patrollers long to review your articles so do apply again when you have reached nearer the default 50 full articles that would not attract the attention of the reviewers. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Pdfpdf

Per User talk:Pdfpdf#WP:RFP/A, (viz: Having just patrolled a few of your new pages I'm struck by how dumb it is to be checking the contribution of someone with 3 times my experience. Please apply for Autopatrolled and save us from pointless work. Happy New Year. Bazj (talk) 12:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)), I would feel very guilty if I did not apply. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)