This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bryce Carmony (talk | contribs) at 09:47, 6 January 2015 (→Dota 2). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:47, 6 January 2015 by Bryce Carmony (talk | contribs) (→Dota 2)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Dota 2
Hello Bryce,
I'm posting on (and starting) your talk page because I am very impressed with your recent work on the Dota 2 page. You see, I created that page over four years ago and have been its top editor ever since, bringing it all the way to Good Article status and it is now on the cusp of Featured Article status. However, I cannot continue editing Misplaced Pages regularly, which is why I am looking for a successor for taking care of the page and bringing it to FA status. Would you be interested in undertaking this task? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 04:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I could definitly look at taking a look at the Dota 2 page. the main things I see that keep it from FA quality is the overall tone reads like an advert to me, I've taken down a lot of the peacock phrases to try and help bring it to a more NPOV that could score QA status. but I think there might be some larger problems as well ( structure of the article as a hole ) but I'd be happy to continue to try and help get it to QA quality. I'll read all the QA articles for other sportsgames and see what motiffs we can emulate to get it to top notch.
-Bryce Carmony