Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Curly Turkey (talk | contribs) at 19:30, 28 April 2015 (Undid revision 659732958 by Boghog (talk) your question is answered inthe appropriate location. You are now being disruptive.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
That's not a "related discussion"; that's the RfC I'm pointing to. Why are you pointing to this RfC as if the discussion has already taken place? Curly Turkey¡gobble!17:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
@Curly Turkey: Sorry, I thought you were opening parallel threads. Nevertheless, I would like to again emphasize that the arguments in favor in deprecating {{cite doi}} are identical to deprecating {{cite isbn}} and {{cite pmid}}. You claim that the arguments differ, but you have not provided any specific examples. Boghog (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
