Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BracketBot (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 24 May 2015 (Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Aubmn, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting Started
• Introduction to Misplaced Pages
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Thomas.W 20:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey there!

The sources on those pages are bad,they are outdated.Sources in our article are newer.

As for the Naval Aviation,I looked there too,and same thing as here:outdated sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RussianBear158 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

List of currently active Russian military aircraft

Yeah,thank you for your trust.

I was in a real hurry,couldn`t go to the talk page,but next time I`ll try to do it.

One tip:the source behind the number MUST be changed with the number.If you change the number without the source,and the source gives another number,than that is bad :( .

RussianBear158 (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Undue weight issues in the Marie Antoinette article

Hello welcome to Misplaced Pages, it seems you don 't understand Misplaced Pages rules, an article should be neutral, describe events with sources, you are using a radical language(neocon,reactionary.. ) not fitting Misplaced Pages, you are talking about revert and you are the only person reverting engaging in edit warring, this may lead you to being blocked, I 'm still trying to be nice with you, I modified the content from some to a minority as a compromise which is the spirit of Misplaced Pages. The article showed what you called Marie Antoinette reactionary or lets say conservative policy, I know it, I contributed perhaps more than any person to this article nevertheless a very small place should be given to the other opinion, this is ok in Misplaced Pages as long as it is clear that it is the position of the minority not hijacking the position of the majority which is critical of Marie Antoinette in the article.Aubmn (talk) 13:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from threatening editors, and keep the debate civil. Secondly, when your edits are deemed contentious by other editors, proceed by seeking consensus on the article talk page rather than engaging in edit warring. Last but not least, I invite you to carefully examine the contents of WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE, both of which state explicitly that minority views within the scholarly community are not be treated equally to mainstream views. Your edits are in violation of both these policies, and will therefore continue to be removed.

If your behavior continues to be based on confrontational and disruptive editing rather than in consensus building and compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, I will call upon moderators to resolve this situation. Thank you. Esnertofidel (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

First, I 'm the one seeking compromise, I changed the content and yet you reverted it again, if you revert one more time, you'll be breaking the 3 rule and you'll be blocked. Second the minority point of view is not treated equally far from it, let 's take the introduction, it is greatly critical of MA almost totally adopting the majority view, certainly over 90%, Finally you are using neocon , reactionary, that's a fact in your edits, I respect your opinion and the change I made reflect that.Thank you.Aubmn (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

That your last warning, one more revert, you'll be blocked, change my edit if you want, propose a compromise, I'm ready to listen...Aubmn (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

You are engaged in edit warring with other editors, and judging by the talk page of the Marie Antoinette article, which reveals you have been repeatedly blocked in recent months, these are not isolated incidents. Consensus is reached by discussing the subject on the talk page, which you have categorically refused to do. Your behavior is in violation of several behavioral Wiki policies, specifically WP:OWN, WP:NPA and WP:Edit warring, and your edits likewise repeatedly violate what is stipulated by WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE.

The prose of the sentence you attempt to insert requires a rewrite to reflect its status as a minority view among historians, and must be moved out of the introduction to a more appropriate section of the article. WP:UNDUE makes it clear that minority views within an academic field are to receive little, if any, coverage relative to mainstream views. As such, its presence within the introduction causes it to assume undue weight. Misplaced Pages policies are not negotiable. Esnertofidel (talk) 13:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

First I was not blocked for this reason but only for a short period of time because they suspected the use of multiple accounts, yet all the editors are demanding from me to give sources to this article because others are not capable...Second fine lets talk, you want to rewrite please do you have my blessing, third I don 't mind moving it but where to put it inside the content of the article.Aubmn (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok you revert 3 times without waiting my response, I'm giving you 2 minutes to revert yourself or I'm going immediately to report you and you'll be immediately blocked.2 minutesAubmn (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

In my response, I was telling ok to rewrite it and why not moving it , the only problem where in the core of the article, began by reverting yourself.Aubmn (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Revert yourself please don 't oblige me to report you, you ll be immediately blocked.Aubmn (talk) 14:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok I'm reporting you, I'm trying to be nice and I proposed to rewrite it and to try to find a place to move it but you don 't even responded...you brought this on yourself.Aubmn (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

In response to your relentless and vociferous violations of basic Misplaced Pages policies, I've opened up a discussion on the Marie Antoinette article's talk page, to notify the moderators who have previously blocked you that your disruptive behavior appears to be resurgent. Esnertofidel (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marie Antoinette may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Secrete entre Marie-Therese et le Comte de Mercy-Argenteau,vol 3|1874|pp=80-90,110-115}}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)