Misplaced Pages

User talk:ManiF

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spahbod (talk | contribs) at 02:05, 25 July 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:05, 25 July 2006 by Spahbod (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
For older discussion, see Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6
User:ManiF is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Blocked

G'day ManiF,

I've not even had Greater and Lesser Tunbs unprotected for three hours, and already you're edit warring! This is not acceptable. I think you need to take the next twenty-four hours off to reconsider your aggressive editing, and I have blocked you accordingly. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 14:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate your concerns, but I didn't revert excessively, I didn't break WP:3RR or any other rules. I only restored the original version before the unilateral POV changes by a user who was acting against the consensus. I was acting within wikipedia rules, please unblock me. --ManiF 15:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
The article had only just been unprotected after an edit war. WP:3RR is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor an entitlement: it's a hard limit. 3RR is not the only way to be blocked for aggressive editing, and is not the reason you're blocked here — you revert warred on an article, even though you knew that aggressive editing would be frowned on. If you'd like the views of another administrator, feel free to bung in a {{unblock}} tag at the bottom of this page, and someone else will come along and review the case. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 15:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Mark, please check your e-mail. --ManiF 15:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh and please take note that I only came upon that article yesterday, and I had never edited there before until today, let alone edit war. I only restored the original version of the article twice, acting based on the consensus on the talk page. So I knew nothing about the history of that page, and if you had issued me a prior warning, I'd have gladly accepted it. From now on, I will be more careful, I always try to edit within the framework of Wiki. So please reconsider you decision and unblock me. Thanks. --ManiF 15:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


Iran related articles noticeboard/Incidents

Please watch this page and post your public messages on this page so that everybody may have access to it. Thanks --Aminz 05:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Yes i know what 3RR is and don't worry i was not gonna violate it. I aprreciate your concern though :). Regarding the argue, it was not an argue from my part, just a reminder why it is called the way it is. Furthermore if we keep silent when for example he says 200,000,000 arabs use arabian gulf in their maps, the admins will think he is speaking the truth. So its better to respond in some cases even if its to a banned sockpuppet :). Ba sepaas, --Spahbod 01:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

I see, did not know that. You get the clarification this time, i will next time he appears :). --Spahbod 02:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)