Misplaced Pages

User talk:DHeyward

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MONGO (talk | contribs) at 05:15, 17 August 2015 (→Arbcom arbitration enforcement: yup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:15, 17 August 2015 by MONGO (talk | contribs) (→Arbcom arbitration enforcement: yup)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)



Friday 10 January22:02 UTC


Please add comments to the bottom


UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. DHeyward (talk)

American Sniper

Would you care to explain your rationale behind your edit at American Sniper (film) in more detail? Describing how a biographical or autobiographical work differs from true events falls well within our boundaries as an encyclopedia. Noting that key scenes in the film are fictional doesn't place "undue weight" on anything; we are describing reality. Some guy (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

I tried to start a discussion with you and instead you deleted more sourced content. I will treat further deletions as vandalism if you refrain from discussing the subject. Some guy (talk) 02:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Cecil

Please be mindful of 3RR on Cecil. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

@Nomoskedasticity: Did I revert? diff? Not intentional if I even did one..--DHeyward (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomoskedasticity did you actually come here to tell me to be mindful when I have no reverts and you just reverted me to an arguable BLP violation? I'll bring it to talk page but if we can describe a thing without "allegedly", we do. --DHeyward (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

GamerGate AfD notice

Hi! I'm leaving you this note because you recently particpated in a discussion that resulted in a deletion request which you may be interested in. NickCT (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Statistics

Hey, DH. I spent two years of undergraduate school and two years of graduate school doing statistical analysis in an econometric context. When I saw the graph plotting the trends, I had exactly the same reaction as you: only the trend lines for the percentages matter, not the raw numbers . Glad to see someone has a grasp of math and stats around here. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Arbcom arbitration enforcement

Doesn't look like your comments there are getting much traction. This is the worst committee this site has ever promoted, so the last thing I would expect from them is sanity.--MONGO 02:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

It's weird because they pretty much adopted my workshop verbatim except for the "no action is an action" which is silly because its not logged. My AE case had an admin bring up a 7 month edit as a 1RR vio. Imagine the chaos of an unlogged "no action." Any action will be wikilawyered as undoing a previous "no action." It just means more drama. I have no horse in the race. The real issue is "involved." Look at the last minor edit I made to signpost that was reverted. Then ask how 2 gamergate admins and gg spa are in an edit war at "My Little pony" article. Idiocy. Too many partisan crackpots. --DHeyward (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
The current POV pushers are just as bad in misusing this website to promote their agenda as the 9/11 CT crowd was. If they adopted your suggestions then that would be a good thing. Not surprised the named sitting arb isn't being sanctioned, but they would then have to sanction the other two for "parity". Pays be to in a position of power...never mind that my efforts to stop people from linking to offsite harassment and to protect countless female editors on this site seems to have been forgotten, but it exceeds most of those out there screeching about inequality.--MONGO 05:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)