This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoseL2P (talk | contribs) at 13:44, 28 September 2015 (I have now trimmed it to less than 600 words). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:44, 28 September 2015 by RoseL2P (talk | contribs) (I have now trimmed it to less than 600 words)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
CSD tag on Knightwatchers
Hi RoseL2P, and thanks for coming on to Misplaced Pages to help us. I just passed a CSD tag you placed at Knightwatchers, and noticed that you used an inappropriate tag on the work. CSD Category A7 is not used for books, it covers non-notable people, animals, web content, clubs, companies and bands. It might help you for the future, to review the categories listed at WP:CSD to ensure you use the right one in the right place :) Regards, Fish 23:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Gianni Mochetti
Thanks for reviewing, unfortunately I mis-spelled his name in the article title! It should be Mocchetti instead of Mochetti. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
hi
| [REDACTED] | Hello! RoseL2P, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Misplaced Pages. Please join us! (P.S. You might also be interested in these links: Misplaced Pages:Introduction and Misplaced Pages:Tutorial.) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:WP_teahouse_logo_2.png){kind=link}
Thank you
Thanks for your recent statements at ArbCom. I had no idea that the edit histories were as they are, especially the timing of the multiple reverts. Your wok is meticulous and suggestive, and I salute you. Jusdafax 23:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Jusdafax, I'm glad to be able to help out. What irks me so much is the way these people drive away new editors and harass content contributors. I think the sooner they stop doing that, the better it will be for everyone. RoseL2P (talk) 13:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- I am late in saying thanks on your talk page- although I thought i send you a thank you notification. I was too busy to check out your userpage to see who you are, since we never met anywhere else. Hat off for getting involved in this pretty hairy problem ! Thanks much for helping as truly uninvolved editor.--Wuerzele (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Wuerzele! RoseL2P (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- I am late in saying thanks on your talk page- although I thought i send you a thank you notification. I was too busy to check out your userpage to see who you are, since we never met anywhere else. Hat off for getting involved in this pretty hairy problem ! Thanks much for helping as truly uninvolved editor.--Wuerzele (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Statement length at arbitration case request
Hi, RoseL2P. I'm an arbitration clerk, which means I help manage and administer the arbitration process (on behalf of the committee). Thank you for making a statement in an arbitration request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GMO articles. However, we ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Your statement significantly exceeds this limit. Please reduce the length of your statement when you are next online. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence; and concise, factual statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the Arbitrators.
For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 13:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reminder, L235. I have now trimmed it to less than 600 words. -RoseL2P (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)