This is an old revision of this page, as edited by C.Fred (talk | contribs) at 13:32, 6 March 2016 (→Original author corrections: now there are no independent sources). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:32, 6 March 2016 by C.Fred (talk | contribs) (→Original author corrections: now there are no independent sources)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Excuse me, but I did not create this entry in the first place. The person who did acted without authorization and made numerous factual errors with serious legal and financial implications for our organization, the Jesuits, the Catholic Church, and possibly others. I am in no way trying to promote or advertise the organization. Rather, I am responding to some unknown person who took it upon him- or herself to publish a series of false statements about the organization. I have indicated with each edit why I was moving the information. There has been no lack of clarity about this. Our preference would be to remove the article completely. Please respect our wishes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoyalawya (talk • contribs) 02:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Dispute
Hoyalawya, you are currently at 3RR, and I would appreciate if you could please stop. Misplaced Pages is not a host for advertisement, and the content being added is highly promotional compared to the original text. Thank you, GAB 02:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hoyalawya, instead of reverting the article repeatedly (which constitutes edit warring, which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages), please explain your concerns regarding the article, and the reason why the content you removed is incorrect. This is the proper way to resolve your dispute. Other actions, such as continuously reverting the article, will not resolve the issue. I patiently await your response here. Thank you :-) ~Oshwah~ 02:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Original author corrections
Please accept these corrections to my original article. I have no reason to believe that they are less accurate than my effort, since they come from the President of the organization.Jzsj (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- The problem now is the article has gone from weak independent sourcing to no independent sourcing. Every source currently cited in the article is somebody connected (currently or formerly) with Center. That warrants a maintenance tag. —C.Fred (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)