This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Redrose64 (talk | contribs) at 08:10, 20 June 2016 (→RfC: Comments on Jewish guilt that have created controversy - Include?: move relisting comment, so that a meaningful q is shown at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:10, 20 June 2016 by Redrose64 (talk | contribs) (→RfC: Comments on Jewish guilt that have created controversy - Include?: move relisting comment, so that a meaningful q is shown at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
Jewish Guilt Comments
I added this section on Searle's recent Jewish comments in this edit here and was summarily removed by User:Sachamcd. I appreciate User:Sachamcd protectiveness over the page as both creator and primary editor, I think removing it is uncalled for - would appreciate other's thoughts and input. | MK17b | (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
RfC: Comments on Jewish guilt that have created controversy - Include?
|
Should the recent comments by Jeremy Searle on "Jewish guilt" be included in this page? Relisted RfC. Cunard (talk) 22:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC), originally posted | MK17b | (talk) 06:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Politicians say silly things all the time. Is there any evidence that this particular soundbyte has received sufficient coverage for it to be included? Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Here are a few of the articles about the comments: Montreal Gazette CTV News Calgary Herald Canadian Jewish News Canadian Jewish News Global News CIJA The Suburban | MK17b | (talk) 23:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- comment summoned by bot. If it's going to be called 'controversial', the cited source should label it as such.
- Otherwise, I think it belongs. Costatitanica (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Any consensus? | MK17b | (talk) 07:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Relisting RfC comment: There is currently no consensus for or against including the material due to lack of participation. I have relisted the RfC to solicit more feedback from the community. Pinging previously involved editors Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs) and Sachamcd (talk · contribs). Cunard (talk) 22:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)