This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 16:46, 14 March 2017 (→Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017): new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:46, 14 March 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) (→Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017): new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
My admin actions |
---|
Contribs • Blocks • Protects • Deletions |
Admin links |
Noticeboard • Incidents • AIV • 3RR |
Backlog • Prod • AfD • Autoblocks |
Arbitration |
Arbitration • Noticeboard • Enforcement |
Checkuser |
RFCU • Clerks page • Checkuser |
Abusive Hosts • VCN proxycheck • ippages |
Multi-RBL lookup • DNSstuff |
• Wannabe Kate's tool • Prefix index |
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
TUSC token 9971e50bd95eab9f57319ec9a0d97086
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account where I changed my password!
Misplaced Pages Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon: Tuesday, May 12 at OHSU
You are invited!
- Tuesday, May 12, 2015: Misplaced Pages Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon – 1 to 4pm
- Misplaced Pages Edit-a-thon hosted by OHSU's Center for Women's Health in honor of National Women's Health Week
- Location: Biomedical Information Communications Center (3280 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239)
- This edit-a-thon is intended to address some of these important differences and to generally improve women’s health information in key articles and topics. Areas for improvement have been identified in cooperation with WikiProject Medicine. Prior Misplaced Pages editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and power cords.
Hope you can make it! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please post to the event page.
Thanks,
To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list.
Well that was ham-fisted
You elected to block block User:Cliff1911 on October 7, 2016
- with no escalating levels of warning
- when the editor had done, quite literally, nothing wrong
- with the result that this productive editor has left the project
so I would call that a trifecta. I would recommend in the future that you read WP:HURTS before taking actions which have the effect of removing good editors (Master Editor, 3 barnstars) from the project.
Your block reason was "You have been blocked temporarily from editing for unexplained deletions on Bend of the River, and multi-years of ignoring requests to include edit summaries."
Taking the first, the editors only edit to Bend of the River was this one, and it's a perfectly fine edit -- not only not a blockable offense, but not an offense of any kind, by any stretch.
The editor removed unsourced material which was idiosyncratic. All, or almost all, of the many film articles I have seen list cast members either as "Joe Smith" or "Joe Smith, as Pinckney Pruddle", not as "Joe Smith as Pinckney Pruddle, an itinerant pinboy". There's nothing necessarily wrong with the latter form -- our articles differ in the way the handle details like this, and fine -- but it's certainly not a requirement to include a description of the character's role or profession. As I say, most (I would even say practically all) of our movie articles don't.
So to block an editor for removing this material, especially considering that it is unsourced -- don't do stuff like that. Are you in the habit of doing stuff like this? If so, please stop. If you are frustrated that the editor did not summarize his edit, well too bad, because I can summarize it for you by clear and obvious inference: "Remove unsourced extraneous material, we do not generally include role characterizations in cast lists". You should have been able to easily infer this motive for the edit and if you are unable to so it does not speak well of your acuity, to be honest.
By the way you could have simply and legitimately reverted the edit per WP:BRD. This would have been the correct thing to do.
As to your second point, "You have been blocked multi-years of ignoring requests to include edit summaries", may I point out two facts, of which you ought to be aware:
- Edit summmaries are not required. They are optional. WP:ES says only "It is good practice to fill in the Edit summary field".
- This particular editor, User:Cliff1911, has been hauled to WP:ANI a few times where his idiosyncratic editing, including failure to provide edit summaries, has been discussed, and the consensus always has been "He's easily a net positive to the project, and he's not going to change, so leave him alone".
If you want WP:ES to say "Failure to provide edit summaries can result in editors being blocked or banned", them you need to run a WP:RfC and get the wording changed. Until you do that, you are not supposed to act on your own just because you, personally, are irritated or in a bad mood or whatever.
As has been pointed out by editors who are familiar with User:Cliff1911, this editor does not engage, and may not know he has a talk page, so upon finding himself blocked, he may have either assumed the block was permanent, or felt unwelcome. Either way, he has apparently left the project for good, not having edited since his block and IMO very unlikely to do so.
So by blocking this editor, you effectively removed him from the project, as I could have predicted, and per point #2 above you have done so in direct contravention of the consensus of even your fellow admins. If you don't want to listen to me, fine, but you ought at least give some respect to admin corps, for goodness' sake.
So not a good move, no. Herostratus (talk) 17:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Just so you know, EncMstr, there's something of a discussion kind of about it here. ansh666 02:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
"Unexplained deletions"
As per consensus we don't include birth places in the (born birth date) field. CrashUnderride 20:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
MGM Grand Fire
Thanks for fixing my "fix"; I didn't know soffit was a real word and thought someone just misspelled socket. :) 68.156.95.34 (talk) 02:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017)
You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (415 Southwest 10th Avenue #300, Portland 97205) on Saturday, March 18, 2017 from 10:00am – 5:00pm. For more information, visit Eventbrite.
Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)