This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 06:20, 3 August 2017 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Lepricavark/Archive 2) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:20, 3 August 2017 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Lepricavark/Archive 2) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| Today's Events
January 9, 2025 |
|---|
Holidays
|
| Birthday |
Adminship Anniversary
|
| First Edit Day |
|
Edit | Purge Other events: this month | this year |
RfA Cullen328
Omitting the ambivalent, and hopefully wrongly interpreted, "take care", would have increased the perceived sensitivity to a large amount. In spite of opposing to all the PC-derived crap of urbanity, civility, safety of spaces, ... I still try to adhere to a higher level of sensitivity, more fully de rigeur, than what I perceived here from the verbiage of an admin to be. Purgy (talk) 10:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- It didn't seem the slightest bit ambivalent to me. Someone cast a POINTy neutral !vote not based on the candidate's qualifications. Cullen responded in a very gracious and sensitive manner. Lepricavark (talk) 11:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)