Misplaced Pages

Gish gallop

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 1990'sguy (talk | contribs) at 02:54, 6 October 2017 (Better.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:54, 6 October 2017 by 1990'sguy (talk | contribs) (Better.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Gish gallop is a term for a debating method that focusses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments; it is considered a fallacious technique. The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationist Duane T. Gish.

The Gish gallop allows a debater to hit their opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place, which wastes the opponent's time and can cast doubt about their debating ability in an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially if no independent fact-checking is involved.

It is generally more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than a free-form one. If one is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique can be countered somewhat by preempting and refuting their commonly used arguments before they have the chance.

See also

Notes

  1. Marcovici 2013, p. 39
  2. Scott 2004, p. 23
  3. Scott 1994
  4. Hayward 2015, p. 67
  5. Grant 2011, p. 74
  6. Johnson 2017, p. 14-15
  7. Grant 2015, p. 55

Sources

Categories: