This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ahunt (talk | contribs) at 15:46, 10 March 2018 (Translation template). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:46, 10 March 2018 by Ahunt (talk | contribs) (Translation template)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| ||
|
them at the article's talk page so that everyone who has an interest in the article may participate.
 | To stop Monkbot, add a message to its talk page. Comments and questions about Monkbot are welcome here. |
ship infobox
Hi, could you add the parameter "ordered=" to the infobox for ships and subs? It's something I've already added manually to pages for these ship classes; CVN-78, DDG-51, LCS-1 & LCS-2, so far it appears to be a worthwhile addition. I think it would handy if it was part of the template. Thanks - WOLFchild 01:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- I could. But, I think that you should first raise this issue at WT:SHIPS with a description of how this parameter would be used.
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 12:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Do you think that's necessary? I just figured it was such a minor, uncontroversial change and obvious improvement, and one already in use in several articles with significant traffic, that it could be made without the need to propose it first. I would've just gone and done it if it wasn't protected (due to vandalism, which this clearly isn't), and I asked you because you showed me how to add it manually, so you're already aware of it. Do you expect opposition to this? - WOLFchild 00:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- We are supposed to be a collaborative encyclopedia so it just seems proper to confer with other editors when making changes to a tool that they all use. Perhaps there will be no interest; perhaps there will be vehement opposition or support; perhaps the reaction will be "meh". It doesn't hurt to solicit input from the WP:SHIPS community; might even be helpful — and doing so costs nothing save the time it takes to post a note at WT:SHIPS.
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Alrighty... I'll post it. - WOLFchild
- So, it's posted there now. Can I count on your support? - WOLFchild 06:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Alrighty... I'll post it. - WOLFchild
- Do you think that's necessary? I just figured it was such a minor, uncontroversial change and obvious improvement, and one already in use in several articles with significant traffic, that it could be made without the need to propose it first. I would've just gone and done it if it wasn't protected (due to vandalism, which this clearly isn't), and I asked you because you showed me how to add it manually, so you're already aware of it. Do you expect opposition to this? - WOLFchild 00:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Why do you prefer to have no userpage?
Just curious I suppose, I am not complaining and you're not the only one, but why nothing at all? It could just as easily be a redirect to your talk page (a common solution) or just blank, either would bluelink it... Prince of Thieves (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I may or may not have answered that question at my RfA where the lack of a user page was the subject of some disapprobation.
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 15:51, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will take a look. Prince of Thieves (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Citation style for the Clitoris article
Please weigh in on this section. I'm not sure whether we should go with a more conventional style or stick with the current style. If we stick with the current style, there are currently some inconsistent aspects in the article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Translation template
I noticed that you are removing the translation template in an attempt to fix the broken use of italics in the template. Just to let you know adding |italic=yes will fix it instead of removing the template. This diff illustrates. - Ahunt (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2018 (UTC)