User talk:Panarjedde - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Panarjedde (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 23 October 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:58, 23 October 2006 by Panarjedde (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Panarjedde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the fourth edit was actually made according consensus reached after discussion in the talkpage

Decline reason:

Consensus or not, 3RR is an electric fence - if it was consensus there are several hundred thousand other editors who could have done it. -- Stifle (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.
You were blocked by William M. Connolley for the following reason (see our blocking policy):
3rr on Julian the Apostate

User notice: temporary 3RR block

There was no consensus; the user is pushing a POV based on bald assertions regarding the existence of some universal "Roman Pagan" faith that supposedly existed in the 4th century. He has offered no evidence for his position, while there are reams of modern scholarship confirming the usage in my most recent edit. His idea of "consensus" is that nobody was willing to get into an edit/revert war with him. Dppowell 20:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Dppowel, I was referring to the "Pagan" vs. "non-Christian" matter. Which is what you denounced me for ( )--Panarjedde 20:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Furthermore, it looks like your last edit confirmed most of my last edit, the one I was blocked for.

All I did was change the capitals to reflect academic usage. The "pagan vs non-Christian" label debate is separate, and I haven't significantly involved myself in it to this point. Dppowell 21:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

--Panarjedde 20:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Right, but in the edits of mine you posted, I was reverting the "non-Christian" vs. "Pagan" matter, not the "pagan" vs. "Pagan" one, as you were referring.--Panarjedde 21:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on October 23 2006 to Julian the Apostate

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 19:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Unfair block

I wish to apologize for blocking you yesterday, as you correctly pointed out you made four reverts but it was outside the 24 hour limit. As soon as your current block expires I will make a note in your block log that the block was not correct. Stifle (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked

As you have admitted to being a sock puppet of a banned user at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kwame Nkrumah, you are also blocked indefinitely. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)