This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Disavian (talk | contribs) at 17:05, 29 October 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:05, 29 October 2006 by Disavian (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Molecularpedia
ZERO google hits! Entirely non-notable wiki failing pretty much every guideline/policy. Pretty much just an advert for a site that hasn't even made Google yet. Wickethewok 01:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Reply: So, you are seeking to eliminate a page to a site that is new...simply because it is new? Which guideline/policies does the page fail, other than being new? --MBurbank 01:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP is for stuff that is already notable, not a place to advertise and help something become notable. TJ Spyke 01:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Site appears to have been launched just today. Misplaced Pages is not an advertising platform or web directory. Fails WP:WEB. Bwithh 01:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Kf4bdy 02:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Non-notable, one day old wiki with only one active contributor.--TBCΦtalk? 03:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. One day old wiki, that's probably record. Pavel Vozenilek 03:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. DoomsDay349 04:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - whqt is molecularpedia?Bakaman Bakatalk 04:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB -- zzuuzz 04:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Just check its stats - Only 1 user, only 5 legit pages (probably less)... Massive fail. -Masamunemaniac 04:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. These things are why I am not dead set against expanding speedy deletion criteria. -Amarkov 05:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete-non notable. Nileena joseph 06:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non notable site. Misplaced Pages should not be used to gain notability, it should document already established notability. JIP | Talk 06:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - nn. --MaNeMeBasat 07:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB. Being a wiki is not inherently a claim to notability. A wiki that consists of only four pages of content, all copied under GFDL from Misplaced Pages, is not ready to publicize itself yet anywhere, much less on Misplaced Pages. --Metropolitan90 07:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete A website that returns 0 google hits cannot possibly be notable. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 10:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per above and WP:SNOW. MER-C 11:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Metropolitan90 and others. A day-old wiki with 4 pages and no original content is a speedy for sure. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as WP:CSD#A7, unremarkable Web content. So tagged. —Caesura 16:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as per nom.Devapriya 16:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete kill with fire. —Disavian (/contribs) 17:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)