Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NickW557 (talk | contribs) at 06:10, 8 November 2006 (RE:Popups). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

TS

Thsnks so much for the support and the helpful edits ! I may change the repetition in OCD to "a subset of OCD", since that is the wording most often used, rather than "some types of" ... is that OK? Sandy (Talk) 13:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• Yup! That's perfectly fine with me. Yeah, I was struggling to find a good synonym to use there...subset seems a better choice! --Gzkn 23:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Weird Al Yankovic featured article nomination

Hey, just letting you know I've replied to your concerns raised on the article. Any further suggestions and comments are welcome. ~ Gromreaper 07:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support!! ~ Gromreaper 09:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

More stinking FACs

If you can't be civil perhaps it is best to pass no comment at all on other editors work. You are entitled to your view but not entitled to insult months of work because it does not happen to entirely coincide with your personal view of what is or is not good prose. Giano 14:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm with Giano. I really appreciated your help (even if I didn't get your support), but honestly, that comment was uncalled-for. I'd like to see if you can write an article as good as mine in your second language, if you have a second language. Nat91 20:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

You said:"Please see my explanation here."

It seemed to me that you were passing comments to a prose expert, so that you wouldn't be the only one objecting in the nomination. To me, it sounds as bad as if I was asking people to support my nomination. You may be wanting to help - all comments are welcome, but this is the impression I got. Nat91 03:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining your usage of the term "stinking". Perhaps you could communicate this also to Giano, ALoan and Nat91. Tony 08:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

More ....ing FACs!

Thank you form commenting at WP FAC West Wycombe Park. I think I have addressed all of your points. Regards Giano 08:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your FAC input

Thankyou very much for providing input on the FA candidate Extratropical cyclone. I was hoping that as your original suggestions have each been acted upon, or in the case of one or two, explained, whether you might consider revisiting the discussion page to either add further comments, or amment your vote to one of support or opposition? Many thanks, Crimsone 01:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Many, many thanks for your vote :D Crimsone 15:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement

Yes, I was shocked too when I saw the state of disrepair that the contemporary art article is in. Thank you for the encouragement as I jump into this mirky water! You mentioned how helpful the sandbox can be. I use it when I'm doing minor edits, but tend to copy and paste larger projects like this one into a microsoft word document. Am I missing some of the features of the sandbox? Is there a way of saving without posting from the sandbox? Thanks again!

lonebiker 15:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info regarding my personal sandbox. I will try using it on this project. Also wanted to ask your opinion on two things. I'm taking this large task on section by section and I began with the easiest, the . i think the strange introduction to this section should be completely edited out. While the first museum discussed is very prominent in the contemporary art field, I'm not quite sure that the claim that it is "the first" contemporary art institution is correct. I also think it might be a contended claim. Furthermore, each of the three museums listed might be served better with their own wiki pages. That being said, I think the extensive list that I have already organized does the job better and more concisely. What do you think?

I am also wondering whether the contemporary art page and the postmodern art page should be merged? If so, I am thinking that the postmodern art page should redirect to the contemporary art page because contemporary art is a more inclusive term (at least until the state of contemporary art changes in some major way away from postmodernism).

Thanks again in advance! I'm so happy I found you!!

lonebiker 01:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Great suggestion to move the contemporary museum list to a new page. I'm not sure if I've covered all of the basis with my page on contemporary art museums. I followed the example of museums of modern art. I don't know how to redirect users who type in "museums of contemporary art."

Thanks for posting the call for more help. It will be interesting to see if any other contributors answer, as it looked like this page has been a shambles for sometime.

I will keep working on it!

lonebiker 04:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

RE:Popups

Yep, that's how it works. Regards, Nick—/_Contribs 06:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)