Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bellezzasolo (talk | contribs) at 18:51, 12 November 2018 (→Cut it out). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Mkenny6, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mkenny6! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

IZ*ONE

IZ*ONE being billed as a "South Korean–Japanese girl group" is not misleading when the TV show was a collaboration between Mnet and the Japanese 48 group. It'd be different, if say, on season one if Ng Sze Kai had made it into the I.O.I. line-up; then it being hypothetically called a "South Korean–Hong Kongese girl group" would be misleading. But not with IZ*ONE, when a Japanese entity is directly involved in their conception and management. diplomat’s son (talk+contrib) 01:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I'm assuming 67.187.85.200 is a secondary account—I've sent you messages here to come to an understanding and air out any grievances you may have, before opening a discussion on the main page itself. Explaining yourself by edit summary only is not productive when dealing with a contentious issue such as this, especially when there are three parties involved now. My comment about it being a "recurring issue" was not in reference to the topic at hand, rather the constant stylization changes taking place on the page. You being of Korean nationality does not make you an expert on the topic either, even then, as Misplaced Pages require you cite sources, you have not embedded any citations as of yet. Please be civil. diplomat’s son (talk+contrib) 02:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Diplomat's Son: Not only that, many sources use "South Korean-Japanese", including Billboard, The Korea Herald and The Korea Times. I have provided sources for the phrase but the user removes them. Heolkpop (talk) 02:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

If Heolkpop has sources to back up the statement, then I think that's sufficient enough. Mkenny6, if you disagree, please give sources as to why. You being Korean doesn't meet the criteria for being a reliable source. If you continue to edit against consensus, there may be issues with competency on your part. lullabying (talk) 03:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Mkenny6: Misplaced Pages goes by what wp:reliable sources state. Please see wp:No original research regarding our opinions. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Mkenny6: Please discuss on talk:IZ*ONE. Please add wp:RS which supports your desired edits. See help:talk pages and wp:BRD Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Iz One

Your recent editing history at Iz One shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. lullabying (talk) 04:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk pages

If you don't or won't "join talks", then please don't edit the article. See help:talk pages for a basic how-to guide. If you don't start/join a discussion, you will likely be wp:blocked. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Second warning at Iz One

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. You noted that you don't know to join a talk. Just go to Talk:Iz One#Nationality dispute and put your comments there. Do not edit against consensus. lullabying (talk) 04:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Do not depend on only the source! That is just an wording to emphasize the reality show’s characteristic.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mkenny6 reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: ). Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Iz One

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Cut it out

If you keep editing contrary to Reliable Sources, nay, removing those sources as you do it, you are going to get yourself an INDEF. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 18:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

The fact is that this group is K-pop girl group and not for J-pop!

The first source cited in the article says otherwise - it explicitly states "hybrid K-pop J-pop". Unless you get a set of sources either more reliable, or more numerous and equally reliable, then it stays. Verifiability. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 18:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)