This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 04:10, 12 June 2018 (Signing comment by 2604:6000:FFC0:46:2C09:F3BE:6C27:203 - "→10th generation paragraph goes under 9th generation: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:10, 12 June 2018 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 2604:6000:FFC0:46:2C09:F3BE:6C27:203 - "→10th generation paragraph goes under 9th generation: new section")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Honda Civic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Honda Civic received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Automobiles C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of ホンダ・シビック from the Japanese Misplaced Pages. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Type R
There are no mentions whatsoever of the Type R for the last gen. civic and there is only an horsepower rating for the first gen. type r, not even an engine code. Still, there are mentions of the type-r concept...
US Civic Si gauges
the 2006 civic si's gauges aren't "more reddish," they are red (I agree with the aggressive comment, though), while the civic EX/LX/DX has blue gauges. I haven't seen the inside of a Hybrid to comment if they are different.
addendum... details re: added mileage stats on June 9, 2008
I bought this car new and have the documentation and track record for the car. It has always effectively achieved the mileage numbers they advertised at the time. That is the reference cited for the information. There is no web link for the owner's manual / dealer information as far as I know, but it is nonetheless accurate. Other generations of the Civic in this Misplaced Pages article include mileage ratings, and the only information provided here for the second generation was specifically for the FE model. The standard model needs to be represented as well, and since 1) it is not always easily found on the web, 2) the EPA site only goes back to 1985 models (as of this writing), 3) I have the information in print, and 4) it is useful information for the Misplaced Pages to have, especially adding the consistency and comprehensiveness of the other information here. Beyond the written reference I cited above (which is not online, since it is in the owner's manual / dealer materials), there is however an online reference as well, in the Honda Civic Gas Mileage - 1978-1985 section, row 46, the third to last entry for 1983 Honda Civic (4 cylinder - M5 - Manual - 34city - 47highway), at this site: http://www.mpgomatic.com/2007/10/16/honda-civic-gas-mileage-1978-2007/ .
Editing References (Dumb Question)
Reference #45 is incorrect now that the SCCA has changed their web site from a .org to a .com domain. The link to the 2011 Solo II Rules would be correct if the .org was replaced with .com. When I attempted to edit the "References" section, all it said was: "Reflist|2" It seems that it is referring to a list maintained elsewhere. Can anyone tell me where this list may be found (and edited)? Thanks...
Nevermind - found it. The actual reference is stored in the section of the article where the reference is cited. (ps. I told you it was a dumb question.)
Safety Rating Table Abbreviations HBK and SAB
What do the abbreviations HBK and SAB represent in the Safety Rating table? Door is straightforward, but I am assuming HatchBacK and Side-AirBag, but I'm not sure. Would it be possible for someone with knowledge in vehicle safety find an authoritative source or annotate with their best guess? I couldn't find anything on the NHTSA safecar.gov site. Thank you.
10th generation paragraph goes under 9th generation
The last paragraph under the description of the 10th generation looks as though it was meant to conclude the 9th generation instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:FFC0:46:2C09:F3BE:6C27:203 (talk) 04:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Categories: