Misplaced Pages

Talk:Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Harmanprtjhj (talk | contribs) at 20:54, 7 January 2019 (→Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2018). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:54, 7 January 2019 by Harmanprtjhj (talk | contribs) (→Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2018)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIndia: History Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSikhism
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Template:Vital article

Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale is not considered a criminal or a terrorist according to the Indian government making it a political murder. An RTI filed by Naveen Gupta regarding this issue brought out the information regarding his status as a common citizen that is falsely touted as a terrorist (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/64663435/). Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale declared Dharam Yudh(Righteous) Morcha(War) against the government to put forth Anandpur Sahib Resolution that briefly asked for the rights of Punjab and Sikhs such as increasing the number of Sikhs in the Indian Army in resolution number 2 (section D) etc.


References https://indiankanoon.org/doc/64663435/ https://en.wikipedia.org/Anandpur_Sahib_Resolution Harmanprtjhj (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The RTI you linked above says, that the question should be referred to Government of Punjab. in any case, the content in the article is cited to reliable third party sources, please check the referenes. DBigXrayᗙ 09:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

The website is a source that can be used a secondary source. The RTI indirectly states that Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale is not recorded as a terroristHarmanprtjhj (talk)

Harmanprtjhj (talk) please share the line from the website that supports your claim. Also please see WP:INDENT and please sign your posts with ~~~~regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

The government of India has not record of him as a terrorist. He might be in the state government but that is an assumption. “The Commission finds the reply of PIO to be in order. Law and order being a state subject, the information regarding cases registered against Jarnail Singh Bhindrawale must be held by Govt. of Punjab.” No mention from the Indian government of him being declared a terrorist by the central government. The state government cannot declare someone a terrorist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmanprtjhj (talk • contribs) 20:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC) The sources and distorted info which you have used are no good. At first I decided to add some neutrality but now I am recognising that this version by you is the problem that it needs no rebuttal but large chunk of removal to restore sanity of the article. Harmanprtjhj (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Harmanprtjhj please assume good faith and Misplaced Pages:Comment on the content, not the contributor. Notice the template {{Controversial}} that is added on the top of this page. kindly follow the advice. regarding the content, if the RTI link you listed above had actually claimed then we could have used it. Since the RTI does not specifically mention the claim that you want to add then that source is not good enough. For controversial articles such as this, we should rely on neutral third party sources so as to steer clear of the bias that is associated with using content from a source that is not neutral. So I would request you to kindly only use neutral third party sources. You are welcome to review the sources, currently in the article and decide for yourself. also please follow WP:INDENT while replying on talk pages. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't think you understand what you are really saying. Your edits are completely non-neutral and agenda driven. I am taking sometime to look into them but as of now you are only distracting from the main issue. Have you carefully checked the article on Osama Bin Laden? Even that is more grammatical and neutral than this article written by you. You haven't even tried to address my assertions about your history with this article. Please don't evade the concerns. Harmanprtjhj (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Categories: