This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 96.36.52.162 (talk) at 19:05, 16 January 2020 (→According to recent studies ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:05, 16 January 2020 by 96.36.52.162 (talk) (→According to recent studies )(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gun control article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gun control article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referencing and citation: criterion not met
Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Gun control. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Gun control at the Reference desk. |
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Gun politics was copied or moved into Gun control with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carterr829 (article contribs).
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shalviya (article contribs).
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 February 2019 and 3 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DaniloHelber (article contribs). Peer reviewers: DaniloHelber.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2019 and 18 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ymarq013.
According to recent studies
@Dmaty63: I'm reverting your addition of "Although according to studies, gun control would not work due to the 100 million guns currently in circulation. It would take too long to get most of them, so the US would take too long to restrict gun policies. This is according to recent studies."
- You need to cite the "recent studies".
- Your comments are excessively vague. For example, why would it matter how many guns are currently in circulation? And what do you mean, "It would take too long"?
DavidMCEddy (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC) hi
Replying to your comment
@DavidMCEddy I’m sorry that I couldn’t sore the research. There are in fact 100 million guns in circulation, which would destroy the whole idea of gun control in the United States. If we were to control guns in the US, it would take years to fully control guns in the USA. You have to realize that this site is for pure editing purposes and facts. People want to know how or even if we can institute gun control. Dmaty63 (talk) 00:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Dmaty63: I agree that the number of guns in circulation in the US is large and is a problem. I also agree that it will take years to "fully control guns in the USA." I further agree that Misplaced Pages is for facts. In particular, Misplaced Pages policy requires editors to cite "reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered." Misplaced Pages is NOT for advocacy.
- I believe that one of the biggest problem driving the large number of guns in circulation in the US today is the common belief that the US got freedom and democracy, liberty and justice for all from the violence of the American Revolution. In v:The Great American Paradox, I document my claim that it didn't happen that way.
- By the way, Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and does not accept original research. Wikiversity, by contract, accepts original research. If you have sources that seem relevant to the discussion in v:The Great American Paradox, you are welcome to modify that article as appropriate. If you have concerns but no sources, you can voice those on the companion "Discuss" page. DavidMCEddy (talk)
Citations -- The Atlantic
I noticed that 'The Atlantic' is cited as evidence 3 times in the article. Given that this is a more of a American political magazine rather than research or a verified source of facts, should this source be used to cite information under general the "studies" section of the article? Seanjaelee (talk) 03:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Seanjaelee: Yes. In fact, on Misplaced Pages, citing a magazine article about research is preferable to citing the research itself. "Misplaced Pages articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources." For a full explanation of this, see Misplaced Pages:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources. — Mudwater 11:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Mudwater: I understand that policy, but I think the the judgment of which "secondary sources" are "reliable" and even maybe "published" can sometimes be contested. I'd like also to see the primary source as well as the secondary that mentions it. I say that, because sometimes the primary source doesn't exist, or is a blatant fraud or is misrepresented. The role of Judith Miller (and others like her) in stampeding the "Coalition of the Willing" into invading Iraq in 2003 comes to mind. DavidMCEddy (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Studies -> United States_United_States-2019-06-02T19:56:00.000Z">
I just added some info and a supporting cite to this section. In doing that, I noticed that all of the studies in the Cross-sectional studies section seem to be specifically about gun control. The study which I added info about is about the relationship between firearm ownership and violent crime, not specifically about gun control. I noticed this while trying to reorganize the run-on paragraph in that section of the article into a bulleted chronological list, so I abandoned that reorganization and just left the info on that study where I had added it. Improve this as may be appropriate. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)_United_States"> _United_States">
- Since the article is specifically about gun control, then it is not unexpected that all of the studies included are regarding gun control. The study you added is not about specific gun control initiatives or legislation, so it's not appropriate to the article - for the reason I described. I've removed it. Anastrophe (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- I agree, however, that the oversized paragraph with all the study info badly needs reworking into manageable paragraphs. Dunno if I'll be able to get to it today though. Anastrophe (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Firearms articles
- Unknown-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- C-Class gun politics articles
- Unknown-importance gun politics articles
- Gun politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Pages in the Misplaced Pages Top 25 Report