This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Balloonman (talk | contribs) at 14:05, 26 December 2006 (Question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:05, 26 December 2006 by Balloonman (talk | contribs) (Question)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
About IP address 192.203.136.246
Hey, I noticed the warning about vandalism which I didn't do -- I just wanted to say that this IP address doing the vandalism (192.203.136.246) is actually the wireless address for an entire community college (College of DuPage)... I hope you won't block it :-/
Sincerely, Victoria Wang | viv4ce(a)yahoo.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.203.136.246 (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC).
- Create an account and you'll be fine. Otherwise, no guarantees. --Doc 21:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Uhepono
Greetings -- My friend who is a Zuni anthropologist apparently wrote out an article on Uhepono, the head of the Zuni underworld, but when I went to look at it it had already been deleted. Just wondering what was so terrible about it that you wrote "FUCK THIS" in the comments when you deleted it!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.28.209 (talk • contribs) }
- Aye, right. Your friend who is a respected anthropologist created an article with the sole content <quote>FUCK THIS</quote>? . Troll begone! --Doc 21:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh. The article itself said "Fuck this?" Weird... Had it been vandalized after he originally wrote it? (I can't see the link you included, it says "limited to admins only." --67.177.28.209 21:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yup. No, only one edit, and it said 'fuck this'--Doc 21:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I'm confused then. Thanks for responding, and working to keep Misplaced Pages clean! --67.177.28.209 22:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Request for review of "Keep" consensus judged for Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Queen's University Chess Club
Doc, I should make myself clear to start that I don't think there was consensus to delete the Queen's University Chess Club article. However, I also do not feel that there was consensus to flat-out keep the article either, as only six people took part in the deletion discussion. I would be much more pleased if the article was relisted in order to obtain a clearer consensus, as I think that this article might set a precedent for the inclusion of other clubs at Queen's University in the project. Thanks for your time. Andy Saunders 00:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Feel free to re-list it.--Doc 00:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was coming to ask the same thing. Would it be OK to do this without going through DRV? JChap2007 00:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just renominate it. You can say the closing admin has no objections if that helps.--Doc 00:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
User name created to Slur an individual
You visit the user page for Bruce cairney before and removed 'unhelpful comments' how about deleting the user completely it is obvoiusly only created to sling mud and BS —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.152.12.41 (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC).
Huh?
You posted the following on my talk page but it doesn't make any sense. I have no idea of which archive you are talking about or why/what was done. Could you educate me? Balloonman 14:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)