Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tigermoon

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tigermoon (talk | contribs) at 12:08, 1 February 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:08, 1 February 2005 by Tigermoon (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Notice

Hi, all. Im not new to Misplaced Pages though I havent worked on it for about 16 months. And I probably won't do much on it even now, as Im quite busy at work, but if you want me to look at some articles for you, leave me a note, and ill let you know what I think. Tigermoon 17:50, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Note

It appears Slrubenstein disagrees with you. Cultural and historical background of Jesus - Amgine

Hi Tigermoon. I see that you reverted my chnges to the summary. Please do not do that. Most of my changes added information, and you shouldn't delete information. The summary distorted or misrepresented what I said; I am sure we all agree the summary should represent what people say. Slrubenstein

In your previous edit to the article, Slrubenstein reverted it. This is what I meant by the above. - Amgine 18:44, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

If Amgine is refering to my changes to the summary, all I reverted was your reversion of my changes. Why did you revert my changes? As I said, they mostly added content and clarification? You shouldn't revert work like that without providing any explanation. Slrubenstein

I do not understand that explanation. I looked at the discussion on the discussion page, and acted out votes. I cant understand what reason you could possibly have to revert implementing the votes unless you are a point-of-view-warrior, which is not justifiable. To me it looked as if you had vandalised FTs changes, you were not editing it properly. It seemed as if you were just implementing your opinion and not taking the discussion page into account. Tigermoon 14:38, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

These votes -- polls really -- are non-binding. In any event, almost all of my changes were consistent with the votes -- and I added much more new information besides. Slrubenstein

Polls are votes; that is why the location people vote in is called a "polling station"! From the appearance of it at the moment, it seems to me as if not one of the votes have been taken account of. If you made changes consistent with the voting, then someone has definitely undone such things. I think this must be corrected. Tigermoon 11:09, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)


You didn't get it quite right Ben, there is some stuff you forgot about Mandaeans, for example. I will show you on Wednesday. By the way, from the comment below, I think you must have logged out when you made the edit. Its quite important to fix this. If your phone is working again can you text me? CheeseDreams 23:33, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. Tigermoon 12:08, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

CheeseDreams

Hi from comments you made at User talk:CheeseDreams - I think you may need to see this. Please let me know if you need any more information. Regards -- sannse (talk) 21:30, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thank-you. Tigermoon 12:08, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)