Misplaced Pages

20 January 2011

• 03:0203:02, 20 January 2011 diff hist +4,715 N User talk:Anthony Mugan ←Created page with '== Suggestion to collaborate on new biographical page re: Paul R Hill== "First can I apologise if this is not the correct way to communicate on Misplaced Pages - this is ...'

18 January 2011

• 23:4623:46, 18 January 2011 diff hist 0 User talk:Aaron Brenneman/Archives/13 No edit summary
• 23:4523:45, 18 January 2011 diff hist +1,017 User talk:Aaron Brenneman/Archives/13 No edit summary

17 January 2011

• 18:2618:26, 17 January 2011 diff hist −38 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill No edit summary
• 01:2001:20, 17 January 2011 diff hist +2,582 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill No edit summary

16 January 2011

• 22:4722:47, 16 January 2011 diff hist +7,658 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill →Paul R. Hill
• 19:5319:53, 16 January 2011 diff hist −703 Unidentified flying object →Investigations: Delete section; I don't think the Billy Meier case properly belongs in a list of government investigations; it's been privately investigated; maybe place in another article
• 19:3919:39, 16 January 2011 diff hist +377 Unidentified flying object →The Kenneth Arnold sightings: A little about all the various theories proposed in 1947
• 18:2518:25, 16 January 2011 diff hist −2 Unidentified flying object →Early history: Again more NPOV wording
• 18:2218:22, 16 January 2011 diff hist +5 m Unidentified flying object →Early history: NPOV: "enthusiasts"-> more neutral "researchers"; add "some", since certainly not everybody agrees
• 18:1818:18, 16 January 2011 diff hist +252 Unidentified flying object →Terminology: Factual correction to Arnold sighting + link; explain who Ruppelt was + links; minor wording changes

14 January 2011

• 18:5218:52, 14 January 2011 diff hist +489 Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting →Widespread UFO reports after Arnold sighting: AAF July 8 states what flying discs are NOT (including space ships); link to Bloecher report
• 18:1218:12, 14 January 2011 diff hist +188 Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting →Publicity and origins of term "flying saucer"

12 January 2011

• 19:3319:33, 12 January 2011 diff hist +2,315 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wilbert B. Smith →Wilbert B. Smith
• 19:0619:06, 12 January 2011 diff hist +2,312 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill →Paul R. Hill
• 00:3700:37, 12 January 2011 diff hist +5,373 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill No edit summary

11 January 2011

• 20:4520:45, 11 January 2011 diff hist +2,443 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill →Paul R. Hill
• 19:5919:59, 11 January 2011 diff hist +1,767 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill →Paul R. Hill
• 00:5800:58, 11 January 2011 diff hist +2,284 Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Hill →Paul R. Hill

10 January 2011

• 21:3321:33, 10 January 2011 diff hist +200 m Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting →Arnold shares the story: Add more Google News links to news articles
• 21:1521:15, 10 January 2011 diff hist +41 m Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting →Arnold talks of possible non-earthly origins: Add title of news link
• 21:0521:05, 10 January 2011 diff hist +85 m Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting →Arnold talks of possible non-earthly origins: Add link to Deseret story at Google News
• 06:4006:40, 10 January 2011 diff hist +99 m Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting →Arnold shares the story: Additional references

28 October 2010

• 21:4221:42, 28 October 2010 diff hist +9 m 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO incident →Criticisms of the Air Force explanation: minor wording changes
• 21:3921:39, 28 October 2010 diff hist +1 m 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO incident →White House concern and the "shoot-down" order: Minor format fix
• 21:3721:37, 28 October 2010 diff hist +55 m 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO incident →The July 29 Air Force press conference and Air Force’s explanation: Minor grammar fixes plus a reference

27 October 2010

• 05:3605:36, 27 October 2010 diff hist +1 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO incident Reorder some material and add additional material, with some references
• 05:2405:24, 27 October 2010 diff hist −360 1952 Washington, D.C. UFO incident Reorder some material and add additional material, with some references

20 October 2010

• 21:3721:37, 20 October 2010 diff hist +93 Rendlesham Forest incident Yes "dozens". At least 5 eyewitnesses 1st night; Halt took a large team with him 2nd night, est. at 50 or 60; also other eyewitnesses interviewed, such as 2 radar people.
• 02:1102:11, 20 October 2010 diff hist +52 Rendlesham Forest incident →The Halt Affidavit: Correction: Conrad issued no public statement (misleading wording). This is a quote from an interview with David Clarke. Conrad also said the events remained unexplained.
• 01:0201:02, 20 October 2010 diff hist 0 m Rendlesham Forest incident →Location: Unit fix

19 October 2010

• 21:1721:17, 19 October 2010 diff hist +347 Rendlesham Forest incident →Location: A more accurate geographical description of where the events took place; e.g., the forest is adjacent to the base (NOT 1 mile away from East Gate)
• 21:0221:02, 19 October 2010 diff hist +234 Rendlesham Forest incident It's pretty remarkable that the introductory paragraph so far says nothing about this happening at a USAF nuclear weapons base with dozens of USAF witnesses
• 20:4720:47, 19 October 2010 diff hist +31 Rendlesham Forest incident Again reworded editorial comment to reflect it is skeptical opinion, not fact; there are researchers who sharply disagree, such as Robert Hastings, who debated Clarke on this very point

10 October 2010

• 22:4122:41, 10 October 2010 diff hist +301 Rendlesham Forest incident →Suffolk Police log: Again one skeptics pure speculation presented as virtually fact & also highly misleading because of time difference. Reworded & also noted discordance in timing.
• 22:2622:26, 10 October 2010 diff hist −269 Rendlesham Forest incident →Statements from eyewitnesses on 26 December: Deleted pure speculation

30 September 2010

• 17:1717:17, 30 September 2010 diff hist +441 Rendlesham Forest incident Some more balance; Hill-Norton & Halt sharply disagree that nothing of importance happened; could add Nick Pope as well.
• 17:0417:04, 30 September 2010 diff hist +7 Rendlesham Forest incident Again, rewriting to remove editorial language where opinion is being cited as fact
• 16:5916:59, 30 September 2010 diff hist +209 Rendlesham Forest incident →Researchers and commentators: YouTube links to Halt's press conference statement

29 September 2010

• 16:2716:27, 29 September 2010 diff hist +2,398 Talk:Majestic 12 →Ruppelt quotes
• 05:2105:21, 29 September 2010 diff hist +74 Rendlesham Forest incident Reworded editorial comment, given as fact, to it actually reflecting opinion of some skeptics

28 September 2010

• 20:0020:00, 28 September 2010 diff hist +1 m Rendlesham Forest incident →Other military installation involvement: Format fix
• 19:5819:58, 28 September 2010 diff hist +78 Rendlesham Forest incident →Other military installation involvement: Why not mention Hill-Norton was once the UK Chief of the Defence Staff? Puts some perspective on his inquiries and opinion.
• 19:5319:53, 28 September 2010 diff hist +397 Rendlesham Forest incident →Other military installation involvement: Quote where Lord Hill-Norton dismisses UK government statements that Rendlesham not of national security interest
• 19:4119:41, 28 September 2010 diff hist +485 Rendlesham Forest incident →Researchers and commentators: Reinserting pure statements of fact. I fail to see what is "unencyclopedic" about them, the rationale for deletion by Skeptic 2
• 02:4202:42, 28 September 2010 diff hist −23 Rendlesham Forest incident →The Halt Affidavit: Delete unverifiable comment: Unless we are mind readers, we don't know for a fact that Halt's affidavit was written strictly from memory
• 02:2302:23, 28 September 2010 diff hist +483 Rendlesham Forest incident →Researchers and commentators: Halt's beliefs and his testimony at Sept. 2010 National Press Club event

27 September 2010

• 20:3620:36, 27 September 2010 diff hist +85 m Kecksburg UFO incident →Scientific articles: External link to skeptical article citing JRASC analysis
• 20:2720:27, 27 September 2010 diff hist +122 Kecksburg UFO incident →2003: Sci Fi Channel reinvestigates case: 3-man AF investigating team also reported back in 1965 in newspapers

25 September 2010

• 01:0101:01, 25 September 2010 diff hist +942 Kecksburg UFO incident →Scientific articles: I'm putting this analytical criticism of the JRASC article back in (slightly shortened), to point out the issue is far from settled