This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:33, 16 January 2021 (Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Cinema of the United States/Archives/2018. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:33, 16 January 2021 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Cinema of the United States/Archives/2018. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cinema of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109233447/http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/research/statistics/acompadmitper.aspx to http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/research/statistics/acompadmitper.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Battle of the Teamsters
Major topic missed. Nothing in here about Teamsters Local 399 and their battles with the Hollywood studios, where the studios want to rid themselves of restrictive practises by the Union. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Changing modern cinema to contemporary cinema(Plus adding in a ton of updates to the topic)
Here an idea that is definitely need on this article. Let change the name of modern cinema to contemporary and update the content of the article to add the current state of the film industry. The Modern section of the film industry is so outdated that I tired of waiting around for people to notice it. First off there is no mention of the films that are used to define the contemporary era of Hollywood in the early 2000s to the current decade. These film after there releases would still have an impact on film and I still don't see a single mention of them; such Star Wars, Harry Potter, Twilight and The Marvel Trilogy of films. Secondly, there are platforms on the internet that are influencing the film making industry, the biggest example is Netflix. Netflix is gaining as much of an audience as traditional Hollywood blockbusters. I'm not able to show examples, but I can point at the stock market value of Netflix; which is higher than Disney and the other Hollywood companies.
I will try to find sources that would define the current era of cinema and share it here. There properly a lot of info on contemporary cinema, I will make sure that I will look through it before posting. --User:Picaxe01 (talk) 5:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Change of Filming location to Toronto
There is the history where film locations started,where and why it left...But not the where and why of now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.137.239 (talk) 06:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Nazi versions
- https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/jun/29/historian-says-hollywood-collaborated-with-nazis
- https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/how-hollywood-helped-hitler-595684 Xx236 (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Urwand, Ben. The Collaboration: Hollywood's Pact with Hitler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013. Xx236 (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Racism in early American film
Isn't this page biased? It ignores problems like Nazism and racism.Xx236 (talk) 08:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- it was Griffith's controversial 1915 epic Birth of a Nation - what was controversial? Xx236 (talk) 08:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- https://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Party-Communism-American-Industry/dp/0761513760 Xx236 (talk) 08:16, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Anybody can edit or submit copy. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Selection of stars
So I understand that any list will be controversial and it's difficult to find a cutoff, but the gallery of stars from the golden age shown seems to be a pretty comprehensive selection of the biggest stars but manages to miss Charlie Chaplin, arguably *the* dominant superstar for the critical early period with a career spanning throughout, and a single person of colour: Sidney Poitier, most obviously. Florence Lawrence, Dick van Dyke, Mickey Rooney, Sessue Hayakawa - these are debatable choices. But Sidney Poitier and Charlie Chaplin? This literally includes the top 22 men and 22 women from the AFI's list of top stars except these two with Chaplin at 10th and Poitier the only one of colour - yet neither are even mentioned in the article. Poitier was a US citizen and Sophia Loren and Laurence Olivier were not, so that's not it either. Harsimaja (talk) 19:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- Top-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class California articles
- Top-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles