This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs) at 12:13, 9 February 2021 (→Tell Abyad quotes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:13, 9 February 2021 by Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs) (→Tell Abyad quotes)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) /
Evidence submission over length
The Arbitration Committee has asked that evidence presentations be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. Your presentation is over 1000 words and stands at about 1400 words by my calculation. Please edit your section to focus on the most relevant evidence and bring your word count down to at or under 1000 words. If you wish to submit over-length evidence, you must first obtain the agreement of the arbitrators by posting a request on the /Evidence talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 21:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- My main evidence is below 1000 words. The rebuttals to Valereee and GPinkerton should be subtracted from the count. Please clarify if this is incorrect. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- The arbitrators have granted you an extension to cover your statement as is at 1,500 words. You may request further extensions if you so need. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 14:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Tell Abyad quotes
The quotes portray it as a fact what happened. Which is just not true and is discussed at length on the talk page. I advise you to self-revert as this will come up in the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan. I agree that they were accused, no problem, but that's it. Latin script is present all over Syria and not only understandable for Kurds coming from Turkey, nor was Tell Abyad unilaterally detached from Raqqa Governorate nor was it ever part of the Kobane canton.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep all discussions about Tell Abyad at its article talkpage. If there is consensus to remove them, then you can remove them. I just quickly looked at the talkpage now and I don't see any consensus to remove the quotes. The only one who wants to remove them is you and the sockpuppet Konli17. I see support for it to remain in the article. If you see something that you feel should be removed and other people disagree, then edit warring is not the way to remove it. You have removed the quote like 10 times now. You did not gain consensus to remove the quotes yet you continued to remove them. Paradise Chronicle, its important that you respect the opinions of other editors. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)