Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bobo192 (talk | contribs) at 13:45, 11 February 2021 (Deletionism.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Merge

Could you explain how this followed by no actual merge into the main page constitutes a "merge"? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

And this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this. If you are not currently undertaking these consensus mergers, please self revert so someone else can be alerted to the work to be done. Thanks. _wjemather 16:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

When you return, per WP:ADMINCOND, please ensure you respond to this and the query a couple of sections below as a priority. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Please could you respond the concerns on this talkpage about your recent actions or I will need to raise this at ANI. Many thanks. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 21:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I note you've continued your tagging spree without responding to the concern raised here. Please answer the questions above at the earliest opportunity. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Requesting edit examination and opinion

Greetings,

Please do visit Talk:Cynthia D. Ritchie#Slander of Benazir Bhutto to examine discussed edits, if you find topic interested requesting your opinion, there.

For neutrality purpose opinion request is being made to users who significantly edited different sides of Pakistani political spectrum articles.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 11:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Canvassing

Please note: this could be seen as canvassing, especially since you appear to have been rather selective with regards to which contributors at earlier similar AfDs you have pinged. _wjemather 21:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Wjemather this user is back but not responding, just in case you were unaware. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 21:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I was not selective as I invited people like @Joalhe1997: who voted keep in the previous discussion. I just missed you for which I apologize. I don't agree with your way of tagging people with WP policies with your way of understanding as you did multiple times with @Bobo192: when they had aspersions. Störm (talk) 06:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The current deletionist slant to the project has put off anyone of any experience from creating any Misplaced Pages articles, and there is now no longer any incentive to do so. I realize there is a current crusade in culture against facts, but to bring this to Misplaced Pages for the sake of it is disruptive from all corners. Note those of us who are being targeted are the ones who have fostered article creation. It seems that the only reason these are argued against is that other people are unwilling to do so. And while we're on the subject of Frankenstein, why are we taking issue with the one person who despises the aims of Misplaced Pages so much that they even decide to send their own article creations to deletion? I note the number of CSD G7 nominations on your own deleted contributions page. This is disturbing behaviour. Was there an individual incident which caused such cynicism against article creation? (Intended as an honest question by the way). What went wrong? Bobo. 10:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

There were many people who were missed, not just me. Please take more care in future, or use a different means of notification. As a courtesy, issues get raised with the individual in order to resolve them without community/administrator intervention (in most cases). Speaking of which, please give an update regarding the mergers (see earlier section & discussion at WT:CRIC#Merges). I suggest it would be wise to address this issue before embarking on further nominations. Thanks. _wjemather 11:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The recent spate of deletionism should prove that merging individual articles into player lists is necessary, despite what deletionists have claimed to the contrary in the past. Why is it that when we've been working to the goals of the project, this concept is rejected, but when we're bowing down to the aims of those who are voluntarily destroying the project, they themselves claim it is necessary? Bobo. 13:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)