This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 22:48, 4 March 2021 (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:48, 4 March 2021 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) /
Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The phrase "articles related to" in the topic bans for GPinkerton, Thepharoah17, عمرو بن كلثوم, and Supreme Deliciousness are struck, to clarify that the bans are not limited to article-space.
For the Arbitration Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
Your ACN post
I have removed your thread from WT:ACN, as it is in breach of your topic ban. ACN is not the place to re-litigate the Arbitration case, nor are you allowed to make an appeal of your topic ban for at a minimum of 12 months. Since this is a good-faith mistake I will not be taking any administrative action, but please do your best in the future to stay away from the topics imposed by your sanction, even if you strongly disagree with them. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Primefac, I received a message from arbcom above: that said that I can discuss the case at WT:ACN, so how can it be a breach of my topic ban when you tell me I can discuss it there? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Replied at my talk (permalink). Primefac (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)