Talk:Social media use by Donald Trump

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Community Tech bot (talk | contribs) at 23:33, 9 April 2021 (Files used on this page or its Wikidata item are up for deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:33, 9 April 2021 by Community Tech bot (talk | contribs) (Files used on this page or its Wikidata item are up for deletion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social media use by Donald Trump article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Social media use by Donald Trump. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Social media use by Donald Trump at the Reference desk.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2017. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Covfefe was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 June 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Social media use by Donald Trump. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

SuspendThePres was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 July 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Social media use by Donald Trump. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Alternative views Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Freedom of speech Low‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Template:WikiProject Donald Trump

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Internet culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Presidents Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social media use by Donald Trump article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Twitter split proposal

I propose that the section Donald Trump on social media#Twitter be split out to Donald Trump on Twitter. It is extremely long and takes up the majority of this article. Natg 19 (talk) 01:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Pinging @Finnusertop, GHcool, JFG, Axisixa, and Nanophosis: (previous participants of a similar discussion) Natg 19 (talk) 00:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose pretty much the entire article is Donald Trump's Twitter activity. The remaining sections are a few paragraphs and don't add much to the article length-splitting them out of the article would not alter the length and create a very awkward stub, "Donald Trump's activity on social media (excluding Twitter)".
The real reason this article is long is because Trump says a lot of crazy stuff on Twitter and we document it, it's that simple. If you have a problem with that, take it up with him and see how far you get. So it's a given that the article is long, but that's not a problem in my view because it's well organised and it's possible to find sections you care about. Blythwood (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary. Trump's social media activity outside Twitter is not notable. — JFG 11:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Perhaps a way forward would be to rename this article to Donald Trump on Twitter, and insert a brief paragraph about his other social media activity. What do you think? — JFG 11:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

This sounds like a good solution to me. My original concern is that the Twitter activity overshadows the "other" social media activity. Perhaps this article was named this way to match with the Barack Obama on social media article. Natg 19 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose - As others have said, Trump's activity outside of Twitter is not worthy of attention, and I doubt any of it is actually written by him anyway. A better solution would be shortening the article, which is more of a melange of certain tweets that have gained notoriety than an summation of his Twitter activity - I doubt we need three paragraphs on Britain First; nobody remembers that. At the very least, Twitter shouln't be a top-level heading, it makes the article very difficult to read - it could be laid out more like this instead. - Axisixa T C 06:16, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Do you support JFG's proposal to rename the article to Donald Trump on Twitter? I would be okay with that solution, if we are to mainly focus on his Twitter activity. Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Personally, I don't think it makes much sense if the article still covers other social media platforms. But none of them are really that relevant anyway, outside of his old Youtube videos, so they could be removed or relegated to a minor mention/paragraph. - Axisixa T C 03:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Approve deletionists are responsible of this situation. The proposal makes total sense. --Deansfa (talk) 03:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Comment by 145.53.114.244

What has happened to Misplaced Pages. When exactly did Misplaced Pages pages become as loaded as certain far left news articles? I am deeply saddened by this turnover. Misplaced Pages used to be the figurehead of the internet, the manifestation of the fantastic dream that the internet would serve to promote free speech and the spread of knowledge. Can you recover, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.53.114.244 (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages still is. We however don't promote stuff not covered by reliable sources. Asartea 15:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Do you have any specific suggestions for how to improve the article's neutrality? RoxySaunders (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

In answer to your question "When exactly did Misplaced Pages pages become as loaded as certain far left news articles", the answer is around November. It was pretty good before then. Now it is filled with information from only one side, with no coverage of opposing viewpoints at all. For this reason it has become useless for me as a resource on subjects like this one. It's become polluted like our air by factories churning out smog and smoke. Really sad. It's a shame, it was really valuable. Kenreader (talk) 07:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Kenreader: When describing controversial subjects, Misplaced Pages aims to provide balanced, impartial coverage of all notable viewpoints. Understand that this does not mean "equal" balance, but a weighted balance proportional to each viewpoint's appearance in reliable sources.

If you have any ideas for how to improve this particular article, this is the page to discuss them. If you have any specific proposals on how to improve Misplaced Pages as a whole, try the Misplaced Pages:Village pump. If you want to spread the word that Misplaced Pages is biased partisan garbage, maybe start a blog? RoxySaunders (talk) 16:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

gab.com

Is this his official gab.com account: https://gab.com/realDonaldTrump ? If it is then this article should link to it. Gab (social network) "is an English-language alt-tech social networking service". (In the days before mega-corporation/mainstream websites there were no "alt-tech" websites but just "websites".) --User123o987name (talk) 10:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Trump "quote"

Is the current "quoted" tweet necessary, and if so, is that the most representative tweet? I get that looking for new tweets may be a tad difficult now, but still. Juxlos (talk) 11:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Tweet on article beginning

The tweet on the article's beginning is currently not visible. Please fix by linking to an archive of the tweet. Thanks! --93.44.108.28 (talk) 11:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

The {{tweet}} template currently does not have this function. I've requested it be added.--Auric talk 12:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Myspace?

Trump also supposedly has a Myspace account: https://myspace.com/donald_trump_offical. Not sure it's real. --Auric talk 12:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Tweets published on @POTUS

Hi X-Editor, thank you for your edit on the usage of @POTUS over the last day. However, you used Newsweek as a source, which is generally not reliable according to WP:RSPSRC. I was able to find a Washington Post article to back up the first sentence of your edit, but unfortunately no reliable source for the second (In these tweets, he complained about Twitter's ban and accused the social media platform, without evidence, of colluding in a conspiracy with the Democratic Party and "the Radical Left" to get him banned, while repeating the rhetoric that first got him banned from his main Twitter account). While I am not disputing that this may be true, I was wondering if you could help me find a WP:RSPSRC-compliant source to back this claim up?--JBchrch (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

I was able to find an article from US News, which is considered reliable, that clarifies the situation surrounding his circumventions . I would suggest changing the paragraph to this:

Trump tried to circumvent this ban by briefly making a series of tweets on the @POTUS Twitter account, but the posts were deleted within minutes of them being tweeted. Trump also tried to circumvent the ban by posting a statement on the @TeamTrump campaign Twitter account in which he complained about Twitter's ban and accused the social media platform, without evidence, of colluding in a conspiracy with the Democratic Party and "the Radical Left" to get him banned, while repeating the rhetoric that first got him banned from his main Twitter account. This account was also banned after the statement from Trump was posted.

X-Editor (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

I slightly expanded the paragraph to reference the suspension of the official campaign handle with a reference to NPR.--DarTar (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

I removed the unreliable newsweek source and replaced it with the reliable US News source. I also fixed the paragraph to say that Trump's without evidence claim was made on his campaign account and not the POTUS account. X-Editor (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

New Twitter?

Is perhaps https://twitter.com/45_POTUS_Trump a new sockpuppet account of Trumps? GavinTroyJohnTom (talk) 18:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, any reliable source to back that up?--JBchrch (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Does Twitter really "request" the removal of Tweets?

I changed the wording from "request" to "demand" in the section that talks about the temporary suspension of Mr Trump's Twitter account, because the fact is, when Twitter forces a user to delete certain tweets in order to have their account reinstated, it is inaccurate to describe such a thing as a "request". It is not "pov" (point of view, or mere opinion) to describe the fact that he had to remove the tweets to get his account reinstated as coercion. It is more accurate than saying "request", which, if you look it up in the dictionary, means "asking politely". Contrast that with "order" or "demand", which involves an element of coercion. -- Mr Gillespie Canberra User (talk) 03:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Stock market reaction to Trump ban

This should be here. Here is one source.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

This is what I started to add, but it doesn't really say Trump being banned is the reason.

==Stock market reaction to bans==
On January 11, 2021, stocks of Alphabet Inc., Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Twitter fell significantly, David Keller of StockCharts.com credited fear of increased regulation for the selloff.
— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vchimpanzee, I found an AP release as well as an FT article, however I to think that stock prices are not really WP:NOT for an article on Donald Trump's usage of social media.--JBchrch (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Now that it's clear the headlines are misleading, I would agree.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

References

Woodley, Kyle (11 January 2021). "Stock Market Today: Big Tech Stocks Thumped After Banning Trump". Kiplinger's Personal Finance. Retrieved 12 January 2021.

Is Sockpuppeting the correct term?

Hello, UK reader here. I'm reading this sentence: "Allies of Trump who posted on his behalf, including........" and noticed that the hyperlink in "who posted on his behalf" is linked to a wikipedia article on sockpuppets. Is this correct? I thought from other media articles that the people who posted for the (former) US President after he was banned did so of their own accord and not using false accounts. It struck me as the wrong link. The external articles I read on Gary Coby said he renamed his Twitter account himself and no false accounts were created. Is that sockpuppeting? Doesn't affect me either way but just something for thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.0.201 (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Verified symbol

Do we really need a verified symbol for the tweet he posted when other articles with tweets do not have the symbol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.254.10.148 (talk) 10:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "Satire and archives" section, please delete the first paragraph, which currently reads 'In May 2017, Trump misspelled the word "coverage" as "covfefe," which quickly turned into a meme on the Internet.' This event is covered in more detail in the "Other controversial tweets" section of this article as well as the separate Covfefe article, which both correctly state that the "coverage" interpretation is merely speculative. It might be relevant to describe here how the covfefe tweet has been the subject of satire, but there is no such material here at this time. Therefore this statement is out of place and incorrect, and the best result will come from simply removing it. 67.188.1.213 (talk) 00:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Volteer1 (talk) 04:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "Satire and archives" section, please change

In January 2019, Trump served hamburgers from McDonald's to the Clemson Tigers champion football team due to the White House's catering staff going on strike.

In January 2019, Trump served hamburgers from McDonald's to the Clemson Tigers champion football team due to the White House's catering staff being furloughed during a government shutdown.

The text "government shutdown" should be cross-linked to the 2018–2019 United States federal government shutdown article.

This change is already supported by the existing reference, which does not say anything about a "strike."

Thanks. 67.188.1.213 (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. I slightly reworded it to be more specific than "a government shutdown" but it was basically what you wrote. Volteer1 (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

It looks good. Thanks! 67.188.1.213 (talk) 01:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2021

I believe that the wording of the first line of "Other social media platforms > Facebook" regarding the ad pricing is unclear. It presently reads "Trump was charged less per ad than Clinton was, Wired claimed," but since the next clause contains potentially contradicting information, I believe a more clear presentation may be "Wired claimed that Trump was charged less per ad then Clinton was," and recommend some variation of a change for clarity.

I am not familiar enough with the citation best-practices on this wiki, so am uncertain whether this is a substantive issue or whether the existing text is correctly worded.--182.158.155.102 (talk) 11:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

45office.com

I found a brief article in a newspaper I was looking at a few minutes ago, and I added some information to this article. The web site is surely notable enough to have its own article but I'm not ready to take the time that would be required to create an article that would stay. Although the site is clearly notable. Some might object to Miller's lofty predictions but I thought it was worth mentioning. I declined to include the lack of information of Trump's ban, or his bragging about how well he handled COVID-19, but for a full article on the site those probably should be mentioned even if they make the article sound biased.

Miller said in the source used that Trump would return in several months, while the article before I changed it said the site would launch in two or three months. Obviously that was not the case and I just used the correct statement by Miller and a different source which linked to the one I removed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft is under way.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Trump twitter fact check tweets of may 26 2020.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Categories: