This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chiswick Chap (talk | contribs) at 12:22, 23 June 2021 ((edit conflict, sorry, I'll fix it in a second) I'm placing this here so we have one discussion rather than three, hope that's ok). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:22, 23 June 2021 by Chiswick Chap (talk | contribs) ((edit conflict, sorry, I'll fix it in a second) I'm placing this here so we have one discussion rather than three, hope that's ok)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)August 2020
A Dobos torte for you!
.jpg)
|
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Abortion in Hong Kong
Hello RZuo,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abortion in Hong Kong for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Template:Z166
John B123 (talk) 09:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Anita Lee
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anita Lee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ─ The Aafī 15:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
LOTR edit warring
Could you please stop edit warring at once, it is forbidden. If you have a valid reason then explain it on the talk page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Stop editwarring on the hatnote for LOTR
This is a warning to User:Chiswick Chap and/or other users, that a hatnote is necessary and in accordance with Misplaced Pages:Hatnote#Ambiguous_term_that_redirects_to_an_unambiguously_named_article, that repeatedly removing valid content without any reason is vandalism, and that showing no sign of communication by themselves but accusing another user of editwarring straightaway is uncivil behaviour.
No discussion initiated on this page or on Talk:LOTR by these users.
These users have not editted LOTR either, so it remains as a redirect to this page, which makes a hatnote necessary.--RZuo (talk) 11:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Dear RZuo, I am afraid you are mistaken or confused. You have three times attempted to add a redirect for the phrase "Leave outside the Immigration Rules" which one might expect to abbreviate to LOIR, were it to be abbreviated at all. A google search for "LOTR" does not turn up any page with that acronym and phrase in the first 10 lists of 10 pages; it turns up many pages of Lord of the Rings. There is no Misplaced Pages page named "Leave outside the Immigration Rules"; and the page you linked to, "Leave to enter", contains neither the words "Leave outside the Immigration Rules", nor the acronym LOTR, nor anything that would stand for that acronym. The gov.uk page on "Immigration Rules" cited in that article, needless to say, does not contain any of those three things either.
- Further, you have accused me of incivility by placing a mildly-worded informal warning notice, above. It was not incivil in any way; indeed I could readily have placed a formal warning instead; and your action in accusing others of incivility is itself unhelpful. Further, the other editor reverted you properly. I do hope, given the amount of time it is now taking to deal with your case, that you will accept gracefully that your proposed hatnote may well not be justified in this instance, and that other editors have (all) acted in good faith. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)