Misplaced Pages

User talk:ChicagoWikiEditor

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ChicagoWikiEditor (talk | contribs) at 05:33, 17 August 2021 (Archived). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:33, 17 August 2021 by ChicagoWikiEditor (talk | contribs) (Archived)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, ChicagoWikiEditor, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

BTR

But I did not add the false sales. :( Check again. All my editions had sources, I think it's wrong inflate. Sorry for something. Ross Lynch Lovers 13:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Update: My last edition with sources (here), the vandalism (here). Sorry. Ross Lynch Lovers 13:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

I've never internally laughed so hard

I swear, MrMclovin's edit summaries on Cr1TiKaL are going down in Misplaced Pages history. There are probably angrier edit summaries out there, but that's the angriest I've seen so far. I've never internally laughed so hard in my life. L33tm4n (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

  • @L33tm4n: For sure, MrMclovin went on like an eight summary passionate rant. What's even funnier is that after all that, they will most likely be back under a new name, and for no other reason than being a brilliant genius, they will run back to the same articles and get banned again lol ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 21:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at AnEsonGib shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DarkerthanTar (talk) 10:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Please read the definition of singer-songwriter before making any more edits in this regard

"... the category is built on the folk-acoustic tradition, although this role has transmuted through different eras of popular music. Singer-songwriters often provide the sole accompaniment to an entire composition or song, typically using a guitar or piano. -- FMSky (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

you're edits are factually wrong, thats all FMSky (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • @FMSky: You ought to read the "Multi-tasking songwriters" section of the songwriters article, and cross reference that with what I told you about how separating the labels implies the artist writes music for others. Also educate yourself on the word "typically", specifically how it is a word that's without absolute explanation.
Moreover, I noticed you gave up on the Dr Dre/Eminem actor argument without taking it to the talk page. Clearly because you're not so confident about it due to your edits being "factually wrong". ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 17:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
not really, i just noticed pretty quickly which type of user i'm dealing with, so i just though fuck it, let this kid do what he wants. both are not actors but if it makes you happy to have it listed there, so be it --FMSky (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
also, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Eminem/Archive_10#Semi-protected_edit_request_on_11_February_2021 FMSky (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • @FMSky: Lol, I'm a grown ass man, not a kid. Clearly being a child is your problem. What the hell are you swearing for on wikipedia? Relax, little boy. That link is referring to placing "actor" in the lead of article, not the infobox. Gold star for trying though. Now run along unless you're going to be constructive ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
yeah i'm gonna do exactly that, life is too short. go ahead and call rappers "singer-songwriters" and "actors", i wont bother you --FMSky (talk) 18:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • @FMSky: If you don't know how to be a Misplaced Pages editor, then don't. Sounds like you're acknowledging you are wrong. If you're doing so then let me know now because I'm in the process of submitting this report? We can let admins decide if youre being disruptive or not? ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I have nothing else to say, and i dont wish to interact with you any further FMSky (talk) 18:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for Comment on the Juice WRLD talk page

There is an RfC ongoing about a topic which you have previously been involved in here. JimKaatFan (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Hoodwinked

Hi - I'm the editor who wrote most of the Hoodwinked article and brought it to FA status a little over eight years ago. The less than $8 million budget was accepted during the review process that the article went through all those years ago, but I realize that sourcing could have been improved, so I did a little digging. A number of quality publications, such as Entertainment Weekly, The A.V. Club, and Tulsa World have given the film's budget as around $15 million, but during a 2009 interview, the film's director, Cory Edwards, stated that the actual budget was under $8 million. This article in The Sydney Morning Herald also gives $8 million as the budget. According to this article from Animation World Network, the "official company line" was that the film's budget was $15 million, but the actual budget was kept "under the radar", which probably explains why there are differing figures. I've expanded the production section to explain all of this and have updated the sourcing. --Jpcase (talk) 12:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)