This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robdurbar (talk | contribs) at 11:28, 29 January 2007 (Protected Template:911ct: content dispute ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:28, 29 January 2007 by Robdurbar (talk | contribs) (Protected Template:911ct: content dispute )(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)9/11 conspiracy theories
The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.
When adding articles to the template please do so in alphabetical order. When adding an article to the template do not forget to add the template to the article. Simply add {{911ct}} directly above the categories the article is part of.
| 9/11 conspiracy theories Theories, urban legends, and pop culture surrounding 9/11 | |
| Theories | |
| Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center | | |
| Proponents and supporters | |
| Kevin Barrett | Robert M. Bowman | Andreas von Bülow | James H. Fetzer | David Ray Griffin | Sander Hicks | Jim Hoffman | Alex Jones | Steven E. Jones | Thierry Meyssan | Michael Ruppert | Peter Dale Scott | Webster G. Tarpley | Barrie Zwicker | |
| Groups | |
| 9/11 Citizens Watch | Scholars for 9/11 Truth | |
| Visual media | |
| Dust to Dust: The Health Effects of 9/11 | Fahrenheit 9/11 | 9/11 Guilt: The Proof is in Your Hands | 911: In Plane Site | Loose Change | 9/11: Press for Truth | |
| Books | |
| 9/11: The Big Lie | The CIA and September 11 | The New Pearl Harbor | The Terror Timeline | The War on Freedom | |
This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist.