This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZScarpia (talk | contribs) at 09:36, 2 September 2021 (2012-13 Employment Tribunal: R Fraser (Claimant); University and College Union (Respondents)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:36, 2 September 2021 by ZScarpia (talk | contribs) (2012-13 Employment Tribunal: R Fraser (Claimant); University and College Union (Respondents))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)2012-13 Employment Tribunal: R Fraser (Claimant); University and College Union (Respondents).
John Mann, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Anti-Semitism, and fellow MP Dennis McShane, former chairman of the Group, appeared as witnesses for Ronnie Fraser, claimant in an employment tribunal where the UCU was the respondent. The tribunal report had the following to say about the two MPs (see page 37 of the report):
- "We did not derive assistance from the two Members of Parliament who appeared before us. Both gave glib evidence, appearing supremely confident of the rightness of their positions. For Dr MacShane, it seemed that all answers lay in the MacPherson Report (the effect of which he appeared to misunderstand). Mr Mann could manage without even that assistance. He told us that the leaders of the Respondents were at fault for the way in which they conducted debates but did not enlighten us as to what they were doing wrong or what they should be doing differently. He did not claim ever to have witnessed any Congress or other UCU meeting. And when it came to anti-Semitism in the context of debate about the Middle East, he announced, “It’s clear to me where the line is ...” but unfortunately eschewed the opportunity to locate it for us. Both parliamentarians clearly enjoyed making speeches. Neither seemed at ease with the idea of being required to answer a question not to his liking."