User talk:QuackGuru - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guppyfinsoup (talk | contribs) at 20:51, 3 February 2007 (Proposed solution). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:51, 3 February 2007 by Guppyfinsoup (talk | contribs) (Proposed solution)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Quack Talk: Discussion

Hello, and Welcome to the Misplaced Pages, QuackGuru! Thanks for creating the "List of articles related to quackery" article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Misplaced Pages experience:

Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Misplaced Pages Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Misplaced Pages and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, QuackGuru, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 20:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank You. --QuackGuru 23:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

New Ideas Discussion

Not really. Misplaced Pages is pretty informal. I'd recommend posting it to your userspace and then ask someone to take a look and see what they think. --Woohookitty 02:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts Discussion

Proposed solution

Sorry, but your proposal would amount to content forking in order to address a POV dispute. Such an action would be very ungood guideline-wise. Simões (/_contribs) 20:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)