This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheGreenFaerae (talk | contribs) at 09:58, 5 February 2007 (Request for Arbitration). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:58, 5 February 2007 by TheGreenFaerae (talk | contribs) (Request for Arbitration)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
| |||||
Signpost Related Mentoring Idea
I just had a idea. If I were to help you with ITN for a few weeks, I might get those "writing skills" you were talking about and be able to do the Wpro Report. -- Punk Boi 8 07:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Trodel, I'm sorry to butt in to the mediation, however, I feel strongly that Nathan needs to be blocked. Since you last warned him about editing in WP space, he has made at least six WP edits and has also begun pestering Ral again about writing for The Signpost. Additionally, he has assigned himself another mediation case. I don't think he is listening to anything that is being said to him and I think we are going to have to face the possibility that this just isn't going to work until he is older. I'm going to block him for 72 hours since the last two 48 hour blocks and numerous warnings don't seem to have touched the sides. I consider all my admin actions open to review, so if you are not happy with this block please go ahead and unblock. I apologise again for butting in. All the best, Sarah 11:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Should be noted that he blanked the section related to him above from your talk page, Trodel. I'm concerned that this isn't working out. – Chacor 12:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
I hope this block really focuses him. If he continues when he returns from this block I think we'll have to go back to AN and ask again about a community ban - and I think indications are are that it would succeed if mentoring has failed. – Chacor 15:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed, but I hope it doesn't come to that. His latest actions are regrettable and could be indicitive of a alternate explanation for his behavior. --Trödel 15:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- I may be overly harsh here, as I'm the one that's had this problem in my face now for almost 6 months, possibly longer - longer than most anyway :( So where are we at? Well, I've still got a glimmer of hope things will work out, but I think our times of being lenient have got to be over. Misplaced Pages is a game it seems, and we're the players.
- He's broken almost every agreement made, and we're being taken for a ride with our generous allowances. I think we need to ram the message home that an agreement means just that, an agreement, nothing more, nothing less.
- If we need to make things clearer, indicating what actions will equal what result, then so be it. A "Do this = face this" type of handling I think is clear for someone his age to understand. The real world wouldn't let him get very far with broken promises, and I don't think we're benefiting for making allowances either.
- I applaud the efforts of those of you handing out offsite tasks; I think that's a great idea. I hope it works out. You guys sure are patient, but I trust you understand why I also feel the game is up and it's time to knuckle in so to say, on the flipside of the situation. -- Longhair\ 10:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
RFC
You may find this of interest. The originator does not appear to have notified you. --Spartaz 09:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- I wouldn't pay too much attention to that anyway, as judging from it he's the only one who can certify that dispute, and two people need to have certified it. Be on the lookout for socks, I say. – Chacor 09:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Edit summary on Misplaced Pages:Reward board
Hi,
I was a bit taken aback when I first saw your edit to Misplaced Pages:Reward board removing User:Punk Boi 8's proposal, since the proposal seemed in good faith at first glance. It would be helpful if you could include something like "per mentoring" or such in the future. I don't know anything about his case specifically; it seems like he's having trouble finding things in the article namespace that interest him, so that the Reward Board might be helpful for him, but I'm a bit biased towards it. Anyway, thanks for working on the mentorship program. -- Creidieki 09:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
WIkipedia:Requests for comment/Trödel
You asked to be notified if others endorsed the statement, which has been done. -Amark moo! 05:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, well, kinda sorta. The original complaint, not really, but people do think that you've done something wrong and that you should comment. -Amark moo! 05:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Request for Arbitration
I am sorry you will not attempt to resolve our dispute in any way. I wish you had been a little more willing to compromise. I do have little doubt that you will revert this as quickly as possible, but I still have to post it to fulfill the rules. I have taken out a request for arbitration. I am sorry it has come to this, but you should make a statement. TheGreenFaerae 09:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)