Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Case - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by (talk | contribs) at 00:17, 2 December 2021 (One sided fight with Huldra: note the better forum). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:17, 2 December 2021 by (talk | contribs) (One sided fight with Huldra: note the better forum)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:ARC" redirects here. For a guide on talk page archiving, see H:ARC.

Shortcut

Requests for arbitration

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests
Request name Motions Initiated Votes
One sided fight with Huldra   1 December 2021 0/0/0
Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 1 December 2024
Shortcuts

About this page

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.


File an arbitration request


Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

  • Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
  • In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
  • Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
  • Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
    • Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
  • Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
  • Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
  • Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
  • Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
  • Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

  • This page is for statements, not discussion.
  • Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
  • Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
  • Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
  • After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
  • Declined case requests are logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

One sided fight with Huldra

Initiated by Bob drobbs (talk) at 23:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by Bob drobbs

I created the article on David Collier (political activist) in good faith with the belief that the subject met notability standards. It's currently in the process of AFD with mixed results. I only learned after the fact that there's drama between him and some users.

In what might be our first interaction ever, Huldra says in the AFD I should be topic banned for creating this page.

Later, I left a message on her talk page informing her that accusations she's made against the topic of this article could be a BLP violation and in future AFD discussions to please stick to notability instead of sharing her personal thoughts about the subject. Her response was to revert my message.

On another talk page, she seems like she's being intentionally combative. I ask her if she's trying to start a fight. She claims that I'm the one who started the fight, by creating the page, and that I could end the fight by deleting it. I give her a final notice to please apologize, or at least agree to stop this fight, or else I'd take it to arbitration. Her response was to ask if I'd delete the page.

So, we're here.

Q: Not sure this is the right place, but does this action by Selfstudier cross the line into canvassing?

Statement by Huldra

User:Bob drobbs: I state on my user-page that I am female, please refer to me as such.

As I assume the arb.com knows, David Collier has a blog he uses (among other things) to doxx any Misplaced Pages editor he disagree with. (No I will not link to any of that; arb.com-members: feel free to contact me for links iff you need it).

Bob drobbs then start an article about him; calling him a "political activist." The article is up for deletion; see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Collier (political activist). I the mean time, Bob drobbs uses the fact that David Collier has an article as an argument that Collier's views are notable

Please topic ban Bob drobbs from any further edits in the I/P area; the area is difficult enough as it is, we don't need this, Huldra (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Bob drobbs; thank you for getting my gender right
I still stand by my opinion that you should be topic-banned from the I/P area of Misplaced Pages, Huldra (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Statement by Selfstudier

WP:DR Selfstudier (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Apparently filer does not understand WP:DR and might read the second para of the big box at top left of this page.Selfstudier (talk) 00:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Statement by GizzyCatBella

All the way to the top? Why? - GizzyCatBella🍁 23:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Statement by User:力 ​

As hinted already, this should be at arbitration enforcement. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

One sided fight with Huldra: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

One sided fight with Huldra: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>-One_sided_fight_with_Huldra">

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)