Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 60.242.13.87 (talk) at 07:16, 8 February 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Point about Jonathan Sarfati, but I'm a bit worried, as they're all a bit... odd, and rather uncritical. Adam Cuerden 03:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

OK Adam, but then name any of his ideological opponents who have so much criticism on their page. For example, see the next section, where Quiddity has censored out the slightest critical link against the atheist Sam Harris. There should be the same standard for all. If the likes of Sam Harris are allowed to have articles free of criticism, then so should Jonathan Sarfati without repeated requests to remove the article. Especially as Sarfati is more highly qualified, a better selling author and a chess champion of his country.60.242.13.87 08:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

External links

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Letter to a Christian Nation do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Misplaced Pages is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Quiddity 08:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

This is nonsense. This link was a proper one by a well known Christian internet apologist. As the article stands, it violates NPOV since it is highly lacking in criticisms. So what specific rule did this link violate? 60.242.13.87 08:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Jonathan Sarfati

Behave yourself 60.242.13.87: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks Josh Parris 02:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Some people are way too sensitive. It is a statement of fact that a number of users hostile to creation vandalized the article, then abused their power to ban their ideological opponents from editing.60.242.13.87 06:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Not that Adam would know real science if he tripped over it deal with the article, not the editors. Josh Parris 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Well Josh, deal with Adam who spouted forth on alleged pseudo-science, instead of dealing with the facts in the article in question.60.242.13.87 07:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS  Geolocate  Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)