Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Blablubbs (talk | contribs) at 13:30, 25 February 2022 (spihelper is having a strange day). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:30, 25 February 2022 by Blablubbs (talk | contribs) (spihelper is having a strange day)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Ineedtostopforgetting

Ineedtostopforgetting (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Ineedtostopforgetting.

A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.

This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.


18 February 2022

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing history show a sudden jump from draft to direct attack on Seloloving's talk page with the usual accusations typical of INTSF. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Justanothersgwikieditor: Re this edit summary, I would invite you to quickly peruse my talkpage history. Not sure if the CU will show anything, but it's never been a one-off. CMD (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Chipmunkdavis, while I agree with you, without other evidence of other editors, I think we can skip the CU for the time being! Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I can't say what's going on here but all of these throwaway accounts are  Technically indistinguishable:
Editor Interaction Analyser (Slater Downer, Elknola Lee Ning Guangyao, Zelensky911, Liana Salgado, Petraeus Henderson, Jessica Thomas Ayato, Kern Mair, Auranori Himegimi, Joseph J. Fitzpatrick, Georgius Rogers, B0nk-fraud53, Noriaki Nora, Elisa Elvin Hu, Lee Ailieism Lillian, Auranori Himegimi, Deva Dove, Psx13, Julie Pearl Zhu, Liming Michiaki, THAAD American dad)
All of these accounts are using the same (admittedly common) device on one single static IP, which does not appear to be a proxy. These are the only accounts to have edited on this IP within the retention window, and as far as I can tell none have ever edited from a different connection, although I did not check them all. Many of these exhibit behaviours described on the LTA page, and their common geographical interests cannot be explained by the IP's location. Others are straight vandal accounts, some of which have already been blocked. If proxy geolocation is to be believed then these accounts are editing from a different continent from the proxies identified below, but that's still an inconclusive result.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Ivanvector (/Edits) 18:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

23 February 2022

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Account created to continue a particular campaign of Otterslort. Also not done with this feud apparently. CMD (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Adding DorsweilerTLN, quacking and following my contribs as usual. CMD (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


Categories: