This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scoutersig (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 12 February 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:46, 12 February 2007 by Scoutersig (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
RE:WikiProject bot pop
No, I am not trying to populate the WikiProjects with bots, I am trying to get bots to put the WikiProject's template on article talk pages. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 1:33pm, February 4, 2007
- I have responded here, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 2:01pm, February 4, 2007
California WikiProject templates
re: Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject California#Oops - small newcomer goof: The issue has already been discussed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Southern California. User:Brien Clark has been doing a Good Thing. This 'oldtimer' (2 years, 15,000 edits) has been doing the same thing. BlankVerse 01:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Spamreporter1. If you're going to canvass other users for their view on the WP:CAL/WP:SOCAL thing, please direct them to a single discussion so that the comments on this issue are not spread across multiple talk pages. Mike Dillon 16:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Re WP:COUNCIL. Kirill Lokshin is one of the most active member, which is why I referred to the Council. Mike Dillon 19:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this to attention of many people. I really didn't realise that I was raising such a big
fuckusruckus. But I do agree with the above and below: let's just have one conversation, and with equal POV amounts. But, again, thanks for your help in this. —ScouterSig 05:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Canvassing
You seem to be involved in a large canvassing effort. Please be usre that you follow the guidelines in Misplaced Pages:Canvassing. -Will Beback · † · 18:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Username
I recommend you get a new username, per WP:USERNAME: "Names that imply an official role". Hesperian 23:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the name was discussed and approved as "clear consensus allow." See discussion archived here.
- Righto. Carry on then. Hesperian 03:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: WikiProject California/WikiProject Southern California observation
I was referring, in particular, to the setup of {{WP India}}. Note that none of the sub-project have their own banner templates, at this point. Kirill Lokshin 21:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Anti-Spam Activities
Hey man, I appreciate the fact that you initiated the discussion on WP:CITY regarding the inclusion of Cable Companies in City Articles. It was a good topic for debate and I believe you have made a contribution to the community by encouraging Bill to discuss it. However, some concerns have been raised that you might be singling out user:Bill Clark. Have you been able to resolve your concerns with Bill or is there anything still outstanding? Alan.ca 07:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Independent proposal for WP:CAL and WP:SOCAL tags
User Spamreporter1 has made a proposal for the tagging issue. He was not previously involved with either project before seeing this discussion, and I belive that his opinion therefore is NPOV. The suggestion is that articles that have no state-wide scope be tagged only locally. Please go to this section on the SoCal page to provide input. —ScouterSig 18:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)