This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chris troutman (talk | contribs) at 16:56, 7 April 2022 (→Missing: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:56, 7 April 2022 by Chris troutman (talk | contribs) (→Missing: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)6:47 am, 8 January 2025 (PDT) Tiptoety's userpage | talk | e-mail | contribs | subpages | edit count | awards | adoption program | ||||||||||
hey ... per request -
— Ched (talk) 16:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC) another knock knock jokeP1: "Knock knock!" P2: "Who's there?" P1: "Joe." P2: "Joe who?" P1: "Joe Doe. John Doe's brother." I'm very original. –apap04 22:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC) MfD nomination of Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks noticeboard headerMisplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks noticeboard header, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks noticeboard header and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks noticeboard header during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Izno (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Gee and haw for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gee and haw is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gee and haw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Oregon Health & Science University Police Badge.jpgThank you for uploading File:Oregon Health & Science University Police Badge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Pbrks 04:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC) MissingHi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC) |