Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:36, 13 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Mawano Kambeu

Mawano Kambeu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability, besides some PR. Trivial awards, and mentions. There's also an article by the same editor on his firm, and one one of his firm's operating divisions. but trying to make multiple articles with essentially the same content is a purely promotional technique.Borderline notability+promotionalism is reason to delete an article. DGG ( talk ) 22:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Doesn't show notability, so fails WP:GNG, and also is clearly WP:PROMO. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Non notable executive. Safiel (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
• comment Hold on with the delete..I guess a major issue here is that "Joseph2302" discovered that I created the article as a non-disclosed paid wiki writer. He has even nominated same article for Speedy deletion. I have already responded sincerely to him here. Editors please read my story here "" before arriving at the conclusion. ThanksHilumeoka2000 (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• Comment Just a note that I declined ALL his speedy delete requests as not being valid speedy delete requests. Safiel (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• Comment As explained on your talkpage, all your articles are still a violation of Wikimedia terms of Use. The issue isn't that I found out, the issue was that you should have disclosed earlier. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 01:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America 01:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• comment. Notice to all editors here! Joseph2302 the AFD nominator is taking this issue personal. He has nominated this same article for speedy deletion on the grounds of "undisclosed paid editing". He has really made me cry for the past 24 hours. I don't know why he's attacking all the pages I created so far. He nominated all of them for speedy deletion and then for AFD. There must be vested interest in his mind. I've already alerted Admins about this issue via the appropriate means. Thanks Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable, promotional. BMK (talk) 04:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• 'Comment Paid editing, even undeclared paid editing, is not a specific reason for deletion at AfD, but we can delete at AfD any article that the consensus determines is unfit for Misplaced Pages. To avoid confusion, we avoid giving paid editing as the sole reason, and i did not even mention it here. I did not need to. We certainly can and will delete an article about a non-notable subject, or a promotional article regardless of subject, and almost all articles written by undeclared paid editors fail on both grounds, along with a good many of those written by declared paid editors. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Notability has not been established, and article is clearly promotional. Being a successful executive or entrepreneur is not enough to warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia. Scr★pIron 14:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete: Yet another promotional, NN, GNG-failing article from someone admitting he was paid to write it. Nuf Ced! Nha Trang 16:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete another Hilumeoka2000 promotional piece. Under other circumstances a redirect to the company would make sense, but that looks likely to be deleted too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.