Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Armenian name in the lede is unnecessary
Armenian name of course can be mentioned in the body of the article, but not in the lede. Articles of Azerbaijani towns of respective 7 district that has been occupied by Armenia except Lachin and Kalbajar also don't Armenian name in the lede. If there is no more discussion, and as the Kovsakan in the lede of this article isn't a result of consensus or any discussion within this talk page, I will remove it and retain the name just in the body of article. Mfikriansori (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Per established practice here on Wiki, places claimed by the Republic of Artsakh that were formerly populated by Armenian-speaking people have their name in the lead in Armenian. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Armenian population of Zangilan was not significant and their present is too recent, so I would like to object. Then, the established practice you've mentioned is based on a reached consensus before, or because long before my edit on this AA topic, that's how editors do? So, what some other users said about consensus, it is not reached through discussion on the respective article? Please enlighten me. Thanks. Mfikriansori (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Nice try, but your POV editing isn't going to work. Based on your talk page you have been warned multiple times (by various editors) to cease your disruptive editing. And based on your edit history, it seems you are duplicating the same tactics on several articles. You should review WP:POVthoroughly. Archives908 (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
I really am not trying anything other than editing. That's it. And yeah, you joined them to also warned me, because my edits are disruptive, righ?
From this sentence on link you attached above "Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources', adding Turkic name for several articles, specially regarding Armenia or Armenian is okay as far as I am concerned.
Also this sentence "Generally, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely because it seems biased" clearly describe what happened to my edit that perceived as disruptive by experienced editors, solely because the perception that either Azerbaijani/Turkic population of Yerevan wasn't as prominent as Armenians and Persians of Ganja or it seems biased. Mfikriansori (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
