Talk:RAF raid on La Caine (1944)

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Izno (talk | contribs) at 05:18, 24 April 2022 (banner cruft). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:18, 24 April 2022 by Izno (talk | contribs) (banner cruft)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RAF raid on La Caine (1944) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: British / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1.75 millionth article

Comgrats! Buc 20:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Please provide quotation

"German staff officers unwisely watched the aircraft through binoculars as they attacked and eighteen were killed." --IIIraute (talk) 00:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

It isn't a quotation, it's a paraphrase from Terraine from the cited page. Re: my reverted edit, I thought that I was the one who put "some" in the sentence, I didn't notice that my Alan Bennettism ("unwisely") was the offending word. Apologies.Keith-264 (talk) 07:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

No worries! Thanks for getting back to me. --IIIraute (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

At least some bugger reads what I write. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 07:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits

@Hugo999: Apols I thought the source ref was a drive-by. Keith-264 (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Categories: