Misplaced Pages

Talk:Rosmalen Grass Court Championships

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Opencross (talk | contribs) at 20:23, 5 June 2022 (→Requested move 5 June 2022: corr). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:23, 5 June 2022 by Opencross (talk | contribs) (→Requested move 5 June 2022: corr)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconTennis Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tennis To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconNetherlands Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Ordina Open logo.jpg

Image:Ordina Open logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis

There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Misplaced Pages (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks. Tennis expert (talk) 08:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. While titles are generally singular, I suspect that this one may be correct with the plural form. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


UNICEF Open → Rosmalen Grass Court Championships – This tournament has been around since 1990 with 5 different sponsors and Tennis Project consensus has been to name things with their non-sponsored names. Obviously it could not remain the Ordina Open because that sponsor has left but really it should be renamed the "Rosmalen Grass Court Championships" as it was when it was non-sponsored in it's first 5 years. Otherwise we have to do this every couple years. I realize this isn't something like Queens Club which was named as such for 50 years before being sponsored. This tourney has been sponsored for 16 of it's 21 years so this is a little trickier to do right and isn't black and white like so many other tournaments. For consistency withing tennis project I would go with "Rosmalen Grass Court Championships" but welcome other input. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Notes on move

This new title seems a bit clunky. May I suggest it becomes the Rosmalen Championships, in much the same way that the Queen's Club Championships have been simplified from being known once as the London Grass Court Championships? Oh...and this tournament was sponsored for the first five years by Continental (source: World of Tennis 1991). Totalinarian (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 5 June 2022

It has been proposed in this section that Rosmalen Grass Court Championships be renamed and moved to 's Hertogenbosch Open.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

Rosmalen Grass Court Championships → 's Hertogenbosch Open – When we need to write a titlename for a page, a tournament in this case, WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRITERIA policy say we should use a title which is commonly used in reliable sources, which should also be short, recognizable, distinguishable, natural, and the actual one isn't. A google search for it gives back just 173.000 results. It's very unpopular choice. It has to be changed for sure. I did some research on the possible alternative names from reliable sources ( official website of the tournament, official professional men's and women's circuit, thas is ATP and WTA) and tested them by using google search. I report in a descending order of popularity what i've found:

  1. 's-Hertogenbosch Open 7.670.000 vs. Rosmalen Open 8.350.000.
  2. ATP 's-Hertogenbosch 1.260.000 results vs. ATP Rosmalen 251.000.
  3. WTA 's-Hertogenbosch 1.380.000 vs. WTA Rosmalen 516.000.
  4. Libéma Open 211.000
  5. 's-Hertogenbosch Grass Court Championships 44.300 vs. Rosmalen Grass Court Championships 173.000. This last choice is the very name used in wikipedia, which has the lowest popularity of all the Rosmalen* variants, thus as i said above, by all means it needs to be changed.

So, summing all the previous results by city names to see which one gets the highest grade of popularity, that is what people are referring to when they ask google for this tournament
Rosmalen* is cited 8.350.000 + 516.000 + 173.000 + 251.000 = 9.290.000 times
's-Hertogenbosch* is cited 7.670.000 + 1.260.000 + 1.380.000 + 44.300= 10.354,300 times. By the argument made, Rosmalen is less popular than 's-Hertogenbosch. Regarding what exact title we need to pick, again the results above say the most popular searched choice is 's-Hertogenbosch Open, therefore this has to be the nametitle to pick. Opencross (talk) 20:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Categories: