Misplaced Pages

]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]

X!--
The following categories contain articles about individuals who almost all have Arabic names.
Arabic names don't have European style surnames that are inherited, father to son.
So, there is no point changing the order in which they are sorted in the categories.
Thanks!
--X

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

:a. ''''' -- The general summary of the allegations that establish an association with terrorism were missing from the transcript. --
:b. ''''' -- The general summary of the allegations of hostile activity were missing from the transcript. --

<ref name=DoDList>, '']'', ] ]</ref>

<ref name=DoDList2>, '']'', ] ]</ref>

is held in ] detention in the ] ]s, in ].<ref name=DoDList2>, '']'', ] ]</ref> His Guantanamo detainee ID number is

{{Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption}}

According to the ] the allegations against XX, in his ], <ref name=Wtop>, '']'', ] ]</ref>

==Combatant Status Review Tribunal== {{Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption}} Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the ] to captives from ]. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct a ]s to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of ] status. Subsequently the ] instituted the ]s. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were ''lawful combatants'' -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an ]. XXX chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal. <ref name=CsrtXXX>, from ]'s '']'' - pages XXX</ref>

===Allegations=== A memorandum summarizing the evidence against XXX prepared for his Combatan Status Reiew Tribunal, was among those released in March of 2005.<ref name=CsrtSummaryOfEvidenceXXX> prepared for ]'s '']'' - ] ] - page XXX </ref> The allegations XXX faced were: ===Testimony===

===Allegations=== During the winter and spring of 2005 the Department of Defense complied with a ] request, and released five files that contained 507 memoranda which each summarized the allegations against a single detainee. These memos, entitled "Summary of Evidence" were prepared for the detainee's Combatant Status Review Tribunals. The detainee's names and ID numbers were redacted from all but one of these memos, when they were first released in 2005. But some of them contain notations in pen. 169 of the memos bear a hand-written notation specifying the detainee's ID number. One of the memos had a notation specifying XXX's detainee ID.<ref name=CsrtSummaryOfEvidencePg> prepared for '']s'' - page 999</ref> The allegations he would have faced, during his Tribunal, were: ===Testimony===

==Administrative Review Board hearing== Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual ] hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant". They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free. The factors for and against continuing to %s were among the 120 that the Department of Defense released on ] ].<ref name=Factors%s> of ] '']'' - page XX</ref>

==Administrative Review Board hearing== Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual ] hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant". They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free. XXX chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.<ref name=ArbXXX>, from ]'s ''] hearing'' - page XXX</ref>

==References== <references/> ] ] ] {{GuantanamoBay-detainee-stub}} {{bio-stub}}